Early-onset colorectal cancer: a comprehensive review reframing hypotheses and defining research priorities

PURPOSE: Early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC), defined as colorectal cancer diagnosed before the age of 50 years, is increasing worldwide and represents a growing clinical and public health challenge. Whether EOCRC constitutes a biologically distinct entity remains uncertain, and current diagnostic and therapeutic strategies are largely extrapolated from late-onset disease. METHODS: This narrative review summarizes recent evidence on EOCRC biology, diagnosis, and management, focusing on molecular and genomic features, tumor microenvironment, exposome-related factors, diagnostic pathways, treatment paradigms, and emerging strategies for early detection. We critically examine the gap between biological insights and real-world clinical practice and outline priorities for future research. RESULTS: EOCRC displays a heterogeneous molecular landscape that substantially overlaps with late-onset colorectal cancer. Although advances in multiomics profiling, liquid biopsy, and microbiome research have improved biological understanding, these findings have not yet translated into EOCRC-specific diagnostic or therapeutic approaches. Diagnosis remains delayed due to age-based screening paradigms and symptom misattribution, resulting in advanced-stage presentation. Younger patients frequently receive intensified treatment despite limited age-specific evidence and insufficient attention to long-term toxicity, fertility, and survivorship. CONCLUSION: EOCRC underdiagnosis is likely multifactorial. While limitations in biological knowledge and diagnostic tools may play a role, the discrepancy between current paradigms and the age-specific risk profiles of younger patients likely represents an important contributing factor. Progress will require biology-informed, risk-adapted screening strategies and EOCRC-focused clinical research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Colorectal Disease
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-026-05145-3
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Early-onset colorectal cancer: a comprehensive review reframing hypotheses and defining research priorities

José Perea, Juan Manuel O’Connor, Greta Catani, Antonino Spinelli
International Journal of Colorectal Disease
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

Early-onset colorectal cancer: a comprehensive review reframing hypotheses and defining research priorities

José Perea, Juan Manuel O’Connor, Greta Catani, Antonino Spinelli
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC), defined as colorectal cancer diagnosed before the age of 50 years, is increasing worldwide and represents a growing clinical and public health challenge. Whether EOCRC constitutes a biologically distinct entity remains uncertain, and current diagnostic and therapeutic strategies are largely extrapolated from late-onset disease. METHODS: This narrative review summarizes recent evidence on EOCRC biology, diagnosis, and management, focusing on molecular and genomic features, tumor microenvironment, exposome-related factors, diagnostic pathways, treatment paradigms, and emerging strategies for early detection. We critically examine the gap between biological insights and real-world clinical practice and outline priorities for future research. RESULTS: EOCRC displays a heterogeneous molecular landscape that substantially overlaps with late-onset colorectal cancer. Although advances in multiomics profiling, liquid biopsy, and microbiome research have improved biological understanding, these findings have not yet translated into EOCRC-specific diagnostic or therapeutic approaches. Diagnosis remains delayed due to age-based screening paradigms and symptom misattribution, resulting in advanced-stage presentation. Younger patients frequently receive intensified treatment despite limited age-specific evidence and insufficient attention to long-term toxicity, fertility, and survivorship. CONCLUSION: EOCRC underdiagnosis is likely multifactorial. While limitations in biological knowledge and diagnostic tools may play a role, the discrepancy between current paradigms and the age-specific risk profiles of younger patients likely represents an important contributing factor. Progress will require biology-informed, risk-adapted screening strategies and EOCRC-focused clinical research.

International Journal of Colorectal Disease
Humanitas University (IT), Universidad de Salamanca (ES), Unidad de Cirugía Artroscópica (ES), Instituto Alexander Fleming (AR), Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT), IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital (IT)
Instituto de Salud Carlos III
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.