Comparing adiposity-related predictors of cardiometabolic disease in two Indigenous Guatemalan municipalities: a cross-sectional receiver operating characteristic analysis

Objectives (1) To compare the ability of body mass index (BMI), waist-to-height ratio and visceral fat, as measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), to predict hypertension and diabetes in men and women and (2) to determine whether the correlation between BMI and visceral fat varies by height quantile. Design We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of a representative survey that included data on anthropometrics, body composition, glycosylated haemoglobin and blood pressure. We used receiver operating characteristic analysis and DeLong CIs to compare the ability of each adiposity measure to predict diabetes and hypertension in each gender. Setting Tecpán and San Antonio Suchitepéquez, Guatemala. Participants 806 non-pregnant adults from 347 households, primarily of Indigenous ethnicity. Primary outcome measures Diabetes, defined as a haemoglobin A1c of greater than 6.5% or self-reported history and hypertension, defined as a systolic blood pressure over 140 or a diastolic blood pressure over 90. Results Among the three adiposity measures, visceral fat was the best predictor of diabetes (area under the curve; AUC 0.73 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.81) (men); AUC 0.75 (95% CI 0.7 to 0.8) (women)) and hypertension (AUC 0.7 (95% CI 0.61 to 0.79) (men); AUC 0.76 (95% CI 0.7 to 0.82) (women)), followed by waist-to-height ratio followed by BMI. All three measures better predicted hypertension in women than in men. In sensitivity analysis, visceral fat and waist-to-height ratio better predicted hypertension and diabetes when BMI was below 30 kg/m 2 . The correlation between BMI and visceral fat did not vary appreciably by height. Conclusions Of the three adiposity measures studied, BIA-derived visceral fat best predicted cardiometabolic disease in the population. In clinical practice, alternative techniques beyond BMI need to be considered when assessing adiposity, screening for cardiometabolic disease and diagnosing clinical obesity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Open
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-104560
Primary Topic
Body Composition Measurement Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing adiposity-related predictors of cardiometabolic disease in two Indigenous Guatemalan municipalities: a cross-sectional receiver operating characteristic analysis

Peter Rohloff, Stephen Alajajian
BMJ Open
Body Composition Measurement Techniques
article

Comparing adiposity-related predictors of cardiometabolic disease in two Indigenous Guatemalan municipalities: a cross-sectional receiver operating characteristic analysis

Peter Rohloff, Stephen Alajajian
article en

Abstract

Objectives (1) To compare the ability of body mass index (BMI), waist-to-height ratio and visceral fat, as measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), to predict hypertension and diabetes in men and women and (2) to determine whether the correlation between BMI and visceral fat varies by height quantile. Design We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of a representative survey that included data on anthropometrics, body composition, glycosylated haemoglobin and blood pressure. We used receiver operating characteristic analysis and DeLong CIs to compare the ability of each adiposity measure to predict diabetes and hypertension in each gender. Setting Tecpán and San Antonio Suchitepéquez, Guatemala. Participants 806 non-pregnant adults from 347 households, primarily of Indigenous ethnicity. Primary outcome measures Diabetes, defined as a haemoglobin A1c of greater than 6.5% or self-reported history and hypertension, defined as a systolic blood pressure over 140 or a diastolic blood pressure over 90. Results Among the three adiposity measures, visceral fat was the best predictor of diabetes (area under the curve; AUC 0.73 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.81) (men); AUC 0.75 (95% CI 0.7 to 0.8) (women)) and hypertension (AUC 0.7 (95% CI 0.61 to 0.79) (men); AUC 0.76 (95% CI 0.7 to 0.82) (women)), followed by waist-to-height ratio followed by BMI. All three measures better predicted hypertension in women than in men. In sensitivity analysis, visceral fat and waist-to-height ratio better predicted hypertension and diabetes when BMI was below 30 kg/m 2 . The correlation between BMI and visceral fat did not vary appreciably by height. Conclusions Of the three adiposity measures studied, BIA-derived visceral fat best predicted cardiometabolic disease in the population. In clinical practice, alternative techniques beyond BMI need to be considered when assessing adiposity, screening for cardiometabolic disease and diagnosing clinical obesity.

BMJ OpenVol. 16(5)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Body Composition Measurement Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparing adiposity-related predictors of cardiometabolic disease in two Indigenous Guatemalan municipalities: a cross-sectional receiver operating characteristic analysis — Peter Rohloff, Stephen Alajajian · BMJ Open (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS