Estimation and inference of the win ratio for two hierarchical endpoints subject to censoring and missing data

The win ratio (WR) is a widely used metric to compare treatments in randomized clinical trials with hierarchically ordered endpoints. Counting-based approaches, such as Pocock's algorithm, are the standard for WR estimation. However, this algorithm treats participants with censored or missing data inadequately, which may lead to biased and inefficient estimates, particularly in the presence of heterogeneous censoring or missing data between treatment groups. Although recent extensions have addressed some of these limitations for hierarchical time-to-event endpoints, no existing methods - aside from the computationally intensive multiple-imputation approach - can accommodate settings that include nonsurvival endpoints that are subject to missing data. In this paper, we propose a simple nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator (NPMLE) of WR for two hierarchical endpoints that are subject to censoring and missing data. Our method uses all observed data, avoid strong parametric assumptions and come with a closed-form asymptotic variance estimator. We demonstrate its performance using simulation studies and two data examples, based on the HEART-FID and ISCHEMIA trials. The proposed method provides a consistent estimator, improves estimation efficiency, and is robust under noninformative censoring and missing at random (MAR) assumptions, offering a flexible alternative to existing WR estimation methods. A user-friendly R package, WinRS, is available to facilitate implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10543406.2026.2667334
Primary Topic
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Estimation and inference of the win ratio for two hierarchical endpoints subject to censoring and missing data

Huiman Barnhart, Sean O'Brien, Yuliya Lokhnygina, Yi Liu et al.
Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
article

Estimation and inference of the win ratio for two hierarchical endpoints subject to censoring and missing data

Huiman Barnhart, Sean O'Brien, Yuliya Lokhnygina, Yi Liu, Roland A. Matsouaka
article en

Abstract

The win ratio (WR) is a widely used metric to compare treatments in randomized clinical trials with hierarchically ordered endpoints. Counting-based approaches, such as Pocock's algorithm, are the standard for WR estimation. However, this algorithm treats participants with censored or missing data inadequately, which may lead to biased and inefficient estimates, particularly in the presence of heterogeneous censoring or missing data between treatment groups. Although recent extensions have addressed some of these limitations for hierarchical time-to-event endpoints, no existing methods - aside from the computationally intensive multiple-imputation approach - can accommodate settings that include nonsurvival endpoints that are subject to missing data. In this paper, we propose a simple nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator (NPMLE) of WR for two hierarchical endpoints that are subject to censoring and missing data. Our method uses all observed data, avoid strong parametric assumptions and come with a closed-form asymptotic variance estimator. We demonstrate its performance using simulation studies and two data examples, based on the HEART-FID and ISCHEMIA trials. The proposed method provides a consistent estimator, improves estimation efficiency, and is robust under noninformative censoring and missing at random (MAR) assumptions, offering a flexible alternative to existing WR estimation methods. A user-friendly R package, WinRS, is available to facilitate implementation.

Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
North Carolina State University (US), Duke University (US), Clinical Research Institute (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Estimation and inference of the win ratio for two hierarchical endpoints subject to censoring and missing data — Huiman Barnhart, Sean O'Brien, et al. · Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS