Comparative Evaluation of Mortality Risk Prediction Tools After Emergency Laparotomy
BACKGROUND: Accurate pre-operative prediction of mortality after emergency laparotomy (EL) is essential as it may facilitate shared decision-making. The aim of our study was to compare the prognostic accuracy of three risk prediction tools following EL. METHODS: ≥ 0.40, excellent; ≥ 0.30, good; ≥ 0.20, moderate; < 0.20, poor) and accuracy was evaluated with the c-statistic (< 1.0, excellent; < 0.90, good; < 0.80, fair; < 0.70, poor). RESULTS: = 0.38). CONCLUSIONS: P-NELA was most accurate in predicting 30-day mortality after EL, while NZRISK performed least reliably in our cohort. These findings highlight the importance of providing external validation for different risk prediction tools within diverse populations to improve peri-operative planning.
Authors
- Sameer Bhat (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3770-8996)
- Tony Lin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1962-860X)
- Ahmed Barazanchi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7543-0230)
- Campbell Hodges
- Wiremu MacFater (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9323-7036)
- Shauna O'Brien
Institutions
- University of Auckland (NZ)
- Wellington Hospital (NZ)
- Auckland City Hospital (NZ)
- Dunedin Public Hospital (NZ)
- Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
- Hutt Hospital (NZ)
- Capital and Coast District Health Board (NZ)
- University of Otago (NZ)
Publication Details
- Journal
- ANZ Journal of Surgery
- Published
- 2026-05-10
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.70730
- Primary Topic
- Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00