Clinical Outcomes and Safety of Customized Corneal Cross-linking for Keratoconus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical outcomes and safety of customized corneal cross-linking (cCXL) for the treatment of keratoconus. Methods: Electronic databases were searched through May 1, 2025, yielding 394 records. Primary outcomes were 12-month changes in maximum keratometry (Kmax), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and thinnest corneal thickness (TCT). Secondary outcomes included additional keratometric indices, uncorrected distance visual acuity, spherical equivalent, higher order aberrations, endothelial cell density, and demarcation line depth. Nineteen studies were included in the systematic review, with 14 studies eligible for meta-analysis. Both single-arm analyses of cCXL and comparative analyses versus non-customized CXL were performed. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to epithelial status and irradiation pattern. Results: At 12 months, cCXL significantly reduced Kmax by −1.29 diopters [D] (95% CI: −1.55 to −1.03 D) and achieved greater Kmax flattening than non-customized CXL (additional −1.39 D; 95% CI: −1.82 to −0.95 D; P < .001). CDVA improved by −0.10 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (95% CI: −0.12 to −0.07; P < .001), exceeding the improvement with non-customized CXL (mean difference: −0.06 logMAR; P = .031). TCT decreased modestly (−4.42 μm; 95% CI: −7.24 to −1.60 μm; P = .006). Significant reductions were observed in total higher order aberrations (−0.24 μm; 95% CI: −0.37 to −0.11 μm; P = .016) and vertical coma (−0.25 μm; 95% CI: −0.49 to −0.00 μm; P = .049). Outcomes were comparable between epithelium-on and epithelium-off cCXL, and no significant endothelial cell loss or serious adverse events were reported. Conclusions: Customized CXL is a safe and effective treatment for keratoconus and provides superior topographic and visual outcomes compared with non-customized CXL through tailored energy delivery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Refractive Surgery
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597x-20260216-01
Primary Topic
Corneal surgery and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Outcomes and Safety of Customized Corneal Cross-linking for Keratoconus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Jui‐Hung Hsu, Tsai-Wei Lin, Tsung-Hsien Tsai
Journal of Refractive Surgery
Corneal surgery and disorders
article

Clinical Outcomes and Safety of Customized Corneal Cross-linking for Keratoconus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Jui‐Hung Hsu, Tsai-Wei Lin, Tsung-Hsien Tsai
article en

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the clinical outcomes and safety of customized corneal cross-linking (cCXL) for the treatment of keratoconus. Methods: Electronic databases were searched through May 1, 2025, yielding 394 records. Primary outcomes were 12-month changes in maximum keratometry (Kmax), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and thinnest corneal thickness (TCT). Secondary outcomes included additional keratometric indices, uncorrected distance visual acuity, spherical equivalent, higher order aberrations, endothelial cell density, and demarcation line depth. Nineteen studies were included in the systematic review, with 14 studies eligible for meta-analysis. Both single-arm analyses of cCXL and comparative analyses versus non-customized CXL were performed. Subgroup analyses were conducted according to epithelial status and irradiation pattern. Results: At 12 months, cCXL significantly reduced Kmax by −1.29 diopters [D] (95% CI: −1.55 to −1.03 D) and achieved greater Kmax flattening than non-customized CXL (additional −1.39 D; 95% CI: −1.82 to −0.95 D; P < .001). CDVA improved by −0.10 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) (95% CI: −0.12 to −0.07; P < .001), exceeding the improvement with non-customized CXL (mean difference: −0.06 logMAR; P = .031). TCT decreased modestly (−4.42 μm; 95% CI: −7.24 to −1.60 μm; P = .006). Significant reductions were observed in total higher order aberrations (−0.24 μm; 95% CI: −0.37 to −0.11 μm; P = .016) and vertical coma (−0.25 μm; 95% CI: −0.49 to −0.00 μm; P = .049). Outcomes were comparable between epithelium-on and epithelium-off cCXL, and no significant endothelial cell loss or serious adverse events were reported. Conclusions: Customized CXL is a safe and effective treatment for keratoconus and provides superior topographic and visual outcomes compared with non-customized CXL through tailored energy delivery.

Journal of Refractive SurgeryVol. 42(5)
Chang Gung University (TW), Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (TW), Keelung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (TW), Chang Bing Show Chwan Memorial Hospital (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Corneal surgery and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.