Assessment of Alphafold Protein Models for Small-Molecule Ligand Docking versus Co-Folding

Molecular docking is a powerful computational tool for predicting protein-ligand interactions, widely employed in drug discovery. However, its effectiveness is often constrained by the availability of experimentally determined, high-resolution protein structures, a process that is both time-consuming and resource-intensive. AlphaFold (AF), a machine learning (ML)-based method, offers an efficient alternative by predicting high-accuracy 3D protein structures directly from amino acid sequences. This study assesses the utility of AF-generated protein models for fragment and larger-ligand docking with Glide, which is a widely used docking approach. The docking workflow is evaluated in an unbiased manner by carrying out binding site identification with FTMap, a binding hot spot prediction software. We show that fragment docking to AF models outperforms docking to the respective unbound protein crystal structures and performs comparably to docking to the corresponding ligand-bound structures when using an unbiased approach. Leveraging the computational efficiency of AF model generation, we also employ ensembles of AF models to incorporate protein flexibility. Results show that docking to AF ensembles improves larger-ligand docking compared to docking to singular AF models and outperforms docking to unbound structures. In addition, we compare docking to AF ensembles to co-folding with AF3 and Boltz-2. The results provide insights into the effectiveness of integrating AF protein models into docking procedures, highlighting their potential for streamlining computational drug discovery processes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.6c01038
Primary Topic
Protein Structure and Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of Alphafold Protein Models for Small-Molecule Ligand Docking versus Co-Folding

Sándor Vajda, Diane Joseph-McCarthy, Hlib Maidanik, Raheel Sarwar et al.
Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Protein Structure and Dynamics
article

Assessment of Alphafold Protein Models for Small-Molecule Ligand Docking versus Co-Folding

Sándor Vajda, Diane Joseph-McCarthy, Hlib Maidanik, Raheel Sarwar, Rohin Bajaj, Maria Lazou, Omid Ziaee
article en

Abstract

Molecular docking is a powerful computational tool for predicting protein-ligand interactions, widely employed in drug discovery. However, its effectiveness is often constrained by the availability of experimentally determined, high-resolution protein structures, a process that is both time-consuming and resource-intensive. AlphaFold (AF), a machine learning (ML)-based method, offers an efficient alternative by predicting high-accuracy 3D protein structures directly from amino acid sequences. This study assesses the utility of AF-generated protein models for fragment and larger-ligand docking with Glide, which is a widely used docking approach. The docking workflow is evaluated in an unbiased manner by carrying out binding site identification with FTMap, a binding hot spot prediction software. We show that fragment docking to AF models outperforms docking to the respective unbound protein crystal structures and performs comparably to docking to the corresponding ligand-bound structures when using an unbiased approach. Leveraging the computational efficiency of AF model generation, we also employ ensembles of AF models to incorporate protein flexibility. Results show that docking to AF ensembles improves larger-ligand docking compared to docking to singular AF models and outperforms docking to unbound structures. In addition, we compare docking to AF ensembles to co-folding with AF3 and Boltz-2. The results provide insights into the effectiveness of integrating AF protein models into docking procedures, highlighting their potential for streamlining computational drug discovery processes.

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
Division of Materials Science and Engineering (AU)
National Institute of General Medical Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Protein Structure and Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.