Ethical aspects in scientific literature on participatory research approaches with older adults: a scoping review protocol

OBJECTIVE: This scoping review will systematically map and synthesize the ethical aspects addressed in the scientific literature on participatory research involving older adults. It will examine both procedural or principle-based research ethics and relational or situational ethics, exploring how these are shaped by contexts and considerations of diversity. The review will also identify conceptual frameworks and gaps to inform research and ethical practice. INTRODUCTION: Participatory research with older adults is gaining momentum, with ethical considerations central to such approaches. Yet the ethical complexity of participatory processes is often underreported. This review will explore how ethical aspects are described in the literature. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies will be included if they focus on individuals aged 60 and over who are involved in research through consultative, collaborative, or co-decisional roles. Eligible studies must explicitly address ethical aspects related to procedural or principle-based research ethics, relational or situational ethics, or both. METHODS: Given the growing emphasis on ethical considerations in participatory research involving older adults, a scoping review is appropriate for mapping the extent, range, and nature of the available evidence. The review will follow JBI methodology and established scoping review frameworks, incorporating both descriptive quantitative and qualitative analyses. Six databases will be searched: Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO, PubMed, CINAHL, and Sociological Abstracts. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts, and assess full texts for inclusion, with a third reviewer consulted as needed. Findings will be organized under conceptual and thematic headings and presented in tables, figures, and descriptive synthesis. REVIEW REGISTRATION: OSF https://osf.io/mr89x.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JBI Evidence Synthesis
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11124/jbies-25-00291
Primary Topic
Participatory Visual Research Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethical aspects in scientific literature on participatory research approaches with older adults: a scoping review protocol

Anna Wanka, Rodrigo Serrat, Davide Lucantoni, Tamar Yellon et al.
JBI Evidence Synthesis
Participatory Visual Research Methods
article

Ethical aspects in scientific literature on participatory research approaches with older adults: a scoping review protocol

Anna Wanka, Rodrigo Serrat, Davide Lucantoni, Tamar Yellon, Nilüfer Yaylagül, Simay İkier, Kaisa Pihlainen, Aija Ozola, Joan Pons-Vila, Otto Gerdina, Samuel Honorio, Barbara Groot, Mehmet Korkmaz, Anna Urbaniak
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This scoping review will systematically map and synthesize the ethical aspects addressed in the scientific literature on participatory research involving older adults. It will examine both procedural or principle-based research ethics and relational or situational ethics, exploring how these are shaped by contexts and considerations of diversity. The review will also identify conceptual frameworks and gaps to inform research and ethical practice. INTRODUCTION: Participatory research with older adults is gaining momentum, with ethical considerations central to such approaches. Yet the ethical complexity of participatory processes is often underreported. This review will explore how ethical aspects are described in the literature. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies will be included if they focus on individuals aged 60 and over who are involved in research through consultative, collaborative, or co-decisional roles. Eligible studies must explicitly address ethical aspects related to procedural or principle-based research ethics, relational or situational ethics, or both. METHODS: Given the growing emphasis on ethical considerations in participatory research involving older adults, a scoping review is appropriate for mapping the extent, range, and nature of the available evidence. The review will follow JBI methodology and established scoping review frameworks, incorporating both descriptive quantitative and qualitative analyses. Six databases will be searched: Web of Science, Scopus, PsycINFO, PubMed, CINAHL, and Sociological Abstracts. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts, and assess full texts for inclusion, with a third reviewer consulted as needed. Findings will be organized under conceptual and thematic headings and presented in tables, figures, and descriptive synthesis. REVIEW REGISTRATION: OSF https://osf.io/mr89x.

JBI Evidence Synthesis
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), Jagiellonian University (PL), Universidade Politécnica de Castelo Branco (PT), University of Ljubljana (SI), University of Eastern Finland (FI), Jerusalem College of Technology (IL), Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL), Akdeniz University (TR), Yozgat Bozok Üniversitesi (TR), Riga Stradiņš University (LV), Institute on Aging (US), DIPF | Leibniz Institute for Research and Information in Education (DE), Department of Health (ZA), Health & Safety in Sports (NL), Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (NL), Universitat de Barcelona (ES), Marmara University (TR), Instituto Piaget (PT), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Participatory Visual Research Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.