Platelet-rich plasma plus hyaluronic acid vs platelet-rich plasma intra-articular injections for knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a common condition characterized by pain, stiffness, and reduced function, significantly impacting quality of life. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the combined use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and hyaluronic acid (HA) compared to PRP alone in treating KOA. The hypothesis was that PRP + HA would provide superior outcomes in pain relief and functional improvement due to their complementary biological effects. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. The analysis included 11 trials with a total of 892 participants. The studies compared the efficacy of PRP + HA compared to PRP alone. Key outcomes evaluated were changes in the visual analogue scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and Inter-national Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-treatment. RESULTS: At baseline, no significant differences in VAS scores were observed between the 2 groups (5.82 ±2.71 for PRP + HA vs 5.66 ±2.96 for PRP). By the 6-month follow-up, PRP + HA showed a more substantial reduction in VAS scores (-2.83 ±1.60 vs -2.56 ±1.66; standardized mean difference (SMD) = -1.08, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): -2.22 to 0.05; p < 0.001), with the largest improvement seen at 24 months (-2.7 ±0.2 for PRP + HA vs 0.4 ±0.23 for PRP; SMD = -14.10, 95% CI: -17.41 to -10.79; p < 0.001). WOMAC scores at 12 months also favored the PRP + HA group (-25.26 ±15.24 vs -19.6 ±14.20; SMD = -0.95; p = 0.01). IKDC scores showed no significant differences between groups. CONCLUSION: The combination of PRP and HA provides superior pain relief and functional improvement compared to PRP alone, particularly at 6 and 24 months. These findings support the inclusion of PRP + HA in KOA treatment protocols and warrant further investigation into its long-term benefits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17219/acem/209523
Primary Topic
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Platelet-rich plasma plus hyaluronic acid vs platelet-rich plasma intra-articular injections for knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Jacek Smereka, Łukasz Szarpak, Mahdi Al-Jeabory, Zuzanna Gaca et al.
Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
article

Platelet-rich plasma plus hyaluronic acid vs platelet-rich plasma intra-articular injections for knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Jacek Smereka, Łukasz Szarpak, Mahdi Al-Jeabory, Zuzanna Gaca, Michał Pruc, Piotr Fudalej, Marcin Tomaszewski, Maciej William Krupowies
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is a common condition characterized by pain, stiffness, and reduced function, significantly impacting quality of life. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the combined use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and hyaluronic acid (HA) compared to PRP alone in treating KOA. The hypothesis was that PRP + HA would provide superior outcomes in pain relief and functional improvement due to their complementary biological effects. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. The analysis included 11 trials with a total of 892 participants. The studies compared the efficacy of PRP + HA compared to PRP alone. Key outcomes evaluated were changes in the visual analogue scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and Inter-national Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-treatment. RESULTS: At baseline, no significant differences in VAS scores were observed between the 2 groups (5.82 ±2.71 for PRP + HA vs 5.66 ±2.96 for PRP). By the 6-month follow-up, PRP + HA showed a more substantial reduction in VAS scores (-2.83 ±1.60 vs -2.56 ±1.66; standardized mean difference (SMD) = -1.08, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): -2.22 to 0.05; p < 0.001), with the largest improvement seen at 24 months (-2.7 ±0.2 for PRP + HA vs 0.4 ±0.23 for PRP; SMD = -14.10, 95% CI: -17.41 to -10.79; p < 0.001). WOMAC scores at 12 months also favored the PRP + HA group (-25.26 ±15.24 vs -19.6 ±14.20; SMD = -0.95; p = 0.01). IKDC scores showed no significant differences between groups. CONCLUSION: The combination of PRP and HA provides superior pain relief and functional improvement compared to PRP alone, particularly at 6 and 24 months. These findings support the inclusion of PRP + HA in KOA treatment protocols and warrant further investigation into its long-term benefits.

Advances in Clinical and Experimental MedicineVol. 35(5)
John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin (PL), Wroclaw Medical University (PL), Ekoinwentyka (Poland) (PL), Lux Research (United States) (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.