Non‐negative Gaussian estimation of variance components in random effects models

Abstract When used to estimate variance components (VCs), confidence intervals (CIs) can be truncated at zero, have a point estimate not in the quoted CI, be empty with positive probability, or be all‐inclusive. This is because they have conflicting dual roles, since they are considered to cover the parameter with a specified probability while also indicating the precision of an estimate. Such results provide counterexamples to the belief that CIs indicate precise estimation and are a validating principle. Repetitions with similar results do not provide a scientific proof—which is disproven by a single counterexample. Our Gaussian theory of error, initiated by J.W. Tukey, only indicates the precision of an estimate, and provides a useful estimate for a unique sample. Simulated distributions of propagated error and margins of error can estimate VCs and non‐negative functions of VCs in balanced random effects models, and in one‐way unbalanced random effects models, providing useful estimates. Decisions made after Gaussian estimation are independent acts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Canadian Journal of Statistics
Published
2026-05-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cjs.70051
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non‐negative Gaussian estimation of variance components in random effects models

André Plante, Michael Plante
Canadian Journal of Statistics
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
article

Non‐negative Gaussian estimation of variance components in random effects models

André Plante, Michael Plante
article en

Abstract

Abstract When used to estimate variance components (VCs), confidence intervals (CIs) can be truncated at zero, have a point estimate not in the quoted CI, be empty with positive probability, or be all‐inclusive. This is because they have conflicting dual roles, since they are considered to cover the parameter with a specified probability while also indicating the precision of an estimate. Such results provide counterexamples to the belief that CIs indicate precise estimation and are a validating principle. Repetitions with similar results do not provide a scientific proof—which is disproven by a single counterexample. Our Gaussian theory of error, initiated by J.W. Tukey, only indicates the precision of an estimate, and provides a useful estimate for a unique sample. Simulated distributions of propagated error and margins of error can estimate VCs and non‐negative functions of VCs in balanced random effects models, and in one‐way unbalanced random effects models, providing useful estimates. Decisions made after Gaussian estimation are independent acts.

Canadian Journal of Statistics
Université du Québec à Montréal (CA), Oldham Council (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Non‐negative Gaussian estimation of variance components in random effects models — André Plante, Michael Plante · Canadian Journal of Statistics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS