Intestinal Ultrasound Adds Diagnostic Value and Safety to a Dietitian‐Led Clinic for Disorders of Gut–Brain Interaction

ABSTRACT Background Disorders of gut–brain interaction (DGBI) affect approximately 40% of the global population. Multidisciplinary models incorporating dietetic management are increasingly used, yet objective assessment tools remain limited. This study evaluated the clinical utility of intestinal ultrasound (IUS) within a dietitian‐led DGBI clinic. Methods Consecutive patients underwent IUS at baseline and after dietetic intervention. Irritable bowel syndrome severity scores (IBS‐SSS) and sonographic parameters were recorded at both visits. Fecal loading was defined by posterior acoustic shadowing and/or colonic diameter > 50 mm. Patient satisfaction was assessed using a 100‐point Visual Analog Scale (VAS), with scores ≥ 75 indicating satisfaction. Results Ninety‐seven patients underwent IUS: 85 met Rome IV criteria for irritable bowel syndrome, 7 for functional constipation, and 5 for functional diarrhea. IUS confirmed the clinical diagnosis in 67% (65/97) and led to management changes in 28% (27/97). Fecal loading was identified in 22% (6/27) of patients reporting diarrhea. Mean satisfaction with IUS was high (97; 95% CI: 87.5–100). Sequential IUS was performed in 38 patients; management of IUS‐defined fecal loading significantly reduced colonic diameter ( p < 0.001) and posterior acoustic shadowing ( p < 0.001), with corresponding improvement in IBS‐SSS scores ( p < 0.0001). New inflammatory bowel disease was detected in 3 (8%) patients. Conclusion IUS enhances diagnostic confidence and informs management in a dietitian‐led DGBI clinic. It represents a safe, well‐tolerated, and cost‐effective adjunct to clinical assessment, supporting its integration into multidisciplinary models of care. Further studies should clarify its role in functional gastrointestinal evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JGH Open
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jgh3.70415
Primary Topic
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Intestinal Ultrasound Adds Diagnostic Value and Safety to a Dietitian‐Led Clinic for Disorders of Gut–Brain Interaction

R Mathias, A. S. Day, R. V. Bryant, L. Bibb et al.
JGH Open
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
article

Intestinal Ultrasound Adds Diagnostic Value and Safety to a Dietitian‐Led Clinic for Disorders of Gut–Brain Interaction

R Mathias, A. S. Day, R. V. Bryant, L. Bibb, D. Bogatic, L. E. Edwards, T. M. Goodsall, S. L. Plush
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Disorders of gut–brain interaction (DGBI) affect approximately 40% of the global population. Multidisciplinary models incorporating dietetic management are increasingly used, yet objective assessment tools remain limited. This study evaluated the clinical utility of intestinal ultrasound (IUS) within a dietitian‐led DGBI clinic. Methods Consecutive patients underwent IUS at baseline and after dietetic intervention. Irritable bowel syndrome severity scores (IBS‐SSS) and sonographic parameters were recorded at both visits. Fecal loading was defined by posterior acoustic shadowing and/or colonic diameter > 50 mm. Patient satisfaction was assessed using a 100‐point Visual Analog Scale (VAS), with scores ≥ 75 indicating satisfaction. Results Ninety‐seven patients underwent IUS: 85 met Rome IV criteria for irritable bowel syndrome, 7 for functional constipation, and 5 for functional diarrhea. IUS confirmed the clinical diagnosis in 67% (65/97) and led to management changes in 28% (27/97). Fecal loading was identified in 22% (6/27) of patients reporting diarrhea. Mean satisfaction with IUS was high (97; 95% CI: 87.5–100). Sequential IUS was performed in 38 patients; management of IUS‐defined fecal loading significantly reduced colonic diameter ( p < 0.001) and posterior acoustic shadowing ( p < 0.001), with corresponding improvement in IBS‐SSS scores ( p < 0.0001). New inflammatory bowel disease was detected in 3 (8%) patients. Conclusion IUS enhances diagnostic confidence and informs management in a dietitian‐led DGBI clinic. It represents a safe, well‐tolerated, and cost‐effective adjunct to clinical assessment, supporting its integration into multidisciplinary models of care. Further studies should clarify its role in functional gastrointestinal evaluation.

JGH OpenVol. 10(5)
John Hunter Hospital (AU), Basil Hetzel Institute (AU), Queen Elizabeth Hospital (AU), Women's and Children's Health Network (AU), Central Adelaide Local Health Network, The University of Adelaide (AU), University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.