Taking a closer look at the Cognitive Scale of the Functional Independence Measure and its clinical application in severe traumatic brain injury: A psychometric study

Despite widespread use of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) in clinical and research settings, the applicability of the Cognitive scale to the traumatic brain injury (TBI) group remains problematic. This study evaluated the clinical utility of the FIM-Cognitive scale. We examined the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the five items of the FIM-Cognitive scale, by comparing them with reference standards provided by performance on 14 specific cognitive and behavioural variables that mapped to individual FIM-Cognitive items. A total of 67 participants with severe TBI comprised an Inpatient sample (n = 35), assessed at 2- and 6-months post-trauma, and a Community sample (n = 32) at 3-years post-trauma. Ceiling effects were common and high (>20% on 14/15 FIM-Cognitive items from Inpatient and Community samples), which impacted responsiveness. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were highly variable in all samples, but few reached an 80% threshold on any index. The clinical utility of the FIM-Cognitive scale thus has significant limitations when used with the severe TBI group, both in the post-acute stages and longer-term. These results suggest that the FIM-Cognitive scale should not be used in isolation for clinical decision-making purposes or benchmarking and service delivery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09602011.2026.2645126
Primary Topic
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Taking a closer look at the Cognitive Scale of the Functional Independence Measure and its clinical application in severe traumatic brain injury: A psychometric study

Anne Pfaff, Donna Wakim, Carmel Whitty, Bronwyn Coward et al.
Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
article

Taking a closer look at the Cognitive Scale of the Functional Independence Measure and its clinical application in severe traumatic brain injury: A psychometric study

Anne Pfaff, Donna Wakim, Carmel Whitty, Bronwyn Coward, Pamela David, Natasha A. Lannin, Robyn L. Tate, Amanda Lane-Brown, Grahame K. Simpson, Christine Taylor
article en

Abstract

Despite widespread use of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) in clinical and research settings, the applicability of the Cognitive scale to the traumatic brain injury (TBI) group remains problematic. This study evaluated the clinical utility of the FIM-Cognitive scale. We examined the sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the five items of the FIM-Cognitive scale, by comparing them with reference standards provided by performance on 14 specific cognitive and behavioural variables that mapped to individual FIM-Cognitive items. A total of 67 participants with severe TBI comprised an Inpatient sample (n = 35), assessed at 2- and 6-months post-trauma, and a Community sample (n = 32) at 3-years post-trauma. Ceiling effects were common and high (>20% on 14/15 FIM-Cognitive items from Inpatient and Community samples), which impacted responsiveness. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were highly variable in all samples, but few reached an 80% threshold on any index. The clinical utility of the FIM-Cognitive scale thus has significant limitations when used with the severe TBI group, both in the post-acute stages and longer-term. These results suggest that the FIM-Cognitive scale should not be used in isolation for clinical decision-making purposes or benchmarking and service delivery.

Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
The University of Sydney (AU), Walsh University (US), Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute (AU), Kleijnen Systematic Reviews (United Kingdom) (GB), IS practice (BE), Agri Processing Services (United States) (US), VR Rehab (United States) (US), Ingham Institute (AU), Total Rehab (US), Monash University (AU), Macquarie University (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.