Uncertainty Quantification for Cardiac Diffusion Tensor Imaging Without Additional Datasets

PURPOSE: Cardiac diffusion tensor imaging (cDTI) is subject to physiological noise, thermal noise, and signal corruption, which cause errors in diffusion measures. While a larger dataset can be decimated to investigate the general precision of measures from fitting smaller datasets, uncertainty quantification (UQ) methods for fitting entire particular datasets are required for UQ to be output from cDTI post-processing pipelines. THEORY AND METHODS: To account for non-idealized errors in cDTI, repetition bootstrap methods with whole-image resampling are required to approximate the sampling distribution of measures. We demonstrate UQ of voxel-wise diffusion measures and myocardial summary statistics over multiple voxels, as well as uncertainty-weighted summary statistics and their uncertainties. Methods are demonstrated on datasets of healthy volunteers and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients. RESULTS: for uncertainty weighted average). The uncertainty of averages over myocardial voxels is useful to understand outlier cases where it is difficult to determine if the result is trustworthy from diffusion measures alone. Uncertainty maps are also useful for highlighting regions of less trustworthy diffusion measures. CONCLUSION: Uncertainty quantification in cardiac diffusion tensor imaging can be performed with respect to the sampling distribution of the available cDTI dataset, provided the dataset design is suitable for repetition bootstrapping.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Published
2026-05-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.70414
Primary Topic
Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uncertainty Quantification for Cardiac Diffusion Tensor Imaging Without Additional Datasets

May Lwin, Maryam Afzali, Sam Coveney, Erica Dall’Armellina et al.
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
article

Uncertainty Quantification for Cardiac Diffusion Tensor Imaging Without Additional Datasets

May Lwin, Maryam Afzali, Sam Coveney, Erica Dall’Armellina, Isaac Watson, Mehak Asad, I R V I N Teh, Jürgen E. Schneider
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Cardiac diffusion tensor imaging (cDTI) is subject to physiological noise, thermal noise, and signal corruption, which cause errors in diffusion measures. While a larger dataset can be decimated to investigate the general precision of measures from fitting smaller datasets, uncertainty quantification (UQ) methods for fitting entire particular datasets are required for UQ to be output from cDTI post-processing pipelines. THEORY AND METHODS: To account for non-idealized errors in cDTI, repetition bootstrap methods with whole-image resampling are required to approximate the sampling distribution of measures. We demonstrate UQ of voxel-wise diffusion measures and myocardial summary statistics over multiple voxels, as well as uncertainty-weighted summary statistics and their uncertainties. Methods are demonstrated on datasets of healthy volunteers and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients. RESULTS: for uncertainty weighted average). The uncertainty of averages over myocardial voxels is useful to understand outlier cases where it is difficult to determine if the result is trustworthy from diffusion measures alone. Uncertainty maps are also useful for highlighting regions of less trustworthy diffusion measures. CONCLUSION: Uncertainty quantification in cardiac diffusion tensor imaging can be performed with respect to the sampling distribution of the available cDTI dataset, provided the dataset design is suitable for repetition bootstrapping.

Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
University of Leeds (GB), University of Leicester (GB), Leicester College (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.