Patient-Reported Quality of Life Predicts First-Cycle Pharmacotherapy Survival in Breast Cancer: A Prospective Cohort Study

Objective: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) provide direct insight into symptom burden and functional status, yet their utility in early pharmacotherapy outcomes in breast cancer remains underexplored. This study investigated whether baseline PROs from the EORTC QLQ-C30 and BR23 questionnaires are associated with and demonstrate discriminative ability for short-term survival during the first pharmacotherapy cycle in breast cancer patients. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study at two secondary referral hospitals in Indonesia from January to October 2025. Women with breast cancer initiating systemic pharmacotherapy were enrolled and followed through completion of the first treatment cycle. The primary outcome was survival of the first cycle, defined as a combined endpoint of death or treatment discontinuation due to adverse effects. Baseline demographic, clinical, and tumor characteristics, along with PROs (EORTC QLQ-C30 and BR23), were compared between survivors (n = 99) and non-survivors (n = 7). Statistical comparisons used Mann–Whitney U tests for PROs. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to evaluate the discriminative performance of PRO domains. Results: Non-survivors were more likely to present with metastatic disease (71.4% vs. 25.3%). Baseline PROs showed marked differences, with survivors reporting higher global health (83.3 vs. 41.7; p < 0.001) and better physical, role, emotional, and social functioning (all p < 0.05). Symptom burden—including pain, appetite loss, constipation, systemic side effects, arm symptoms, and financial difficulty—was higher among non-survivors (all p < 0.05). ROC analysis demonstrated strong discriminative performance for global health status (AUC 0.907; p < 0.001), emotional functioning (AUC 0.846; p = 0.002), and social functioning (AUC 0.843; p = 0.003), with moderate performance for physical functioning (AUC 0.737; p = 0.037). Symptom domains showed lower and inverse AUC values, reflecting scale directionality and limited discriminative capacity. Conclusions: Baseline PROs using EORTC QLQ-C30 and BR23 were strongly associated with early pharmacotherapy survival and demonstrated meaningful discriminative ability, particularly in global and functional domains. Integrating PRO assessments before treatment initiation may enhance early risk stratification, guide supportive care, and improve treatment continuity in breast cancer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Sciences
Published
2026-05-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci14020247
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient-Reported Quality of Life Predicts First-Cycle Pharmacotherapy Survival in Breast Cancer: A Prospective Cohort Study

M. Savitri, Ami Ashariati, Henry Sutanto, Een Hendarsih
Medical Sciences
Cancer survivorship and care
article

Patient-Reported Quality of Life Predicts First-Cycle Pharmacotherapy Survival in Breast Cancer: A Prospective Cohort Study

M. Savitri, Ami Ashariati, Henry Sutanto, Een Hendarsih
article en

Abstract

Objective: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) provide direct insight into symptom burden and functional status, yet their utility in early pharmacotherapy outcomes in breast cancer remains underexplored. This study investigated whether baseline PROs from the EORTC QLQ-C30 and BR23 questionnaires are associated with and demonstrate discriminative ability for short-term survival during the first pharmacotherapy cycle in breast cancer patients. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study at two secondary referral hospitals in Indonesia from January to October 2025. Women with breast cancer initiating systemic pharmacotherapy were enrolled and followed through completion of the first treatment cycle. The primary outcome was survival of the first cycle, defined as a combined endpoint of death or treatment discontinuation due to adverse effects. Baseline demographic, clinical, and tumor characteristics, along with PROs (EORTC QLQ-C30 and BR23), were compared between survivors (n = 99) and non-survivors (n = 7). Statistical comparisons used Mann–Whitney U tests for PROs. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to evaluate the discriminative performance of PRO domains. Results: Non-survivors were more likely to present with metastatic disease (71.4% vs. 25.3%). Baseline PROs showed marked differences, with survivors reporting higher global health (83.3 vs. 41.7; p < 0.001) and better physical, role, emotional, and social functioning (all p < 0.05). Symptom burden—including pain, appetite loss, constipation, systemic side effects, arm symptoms, and financial difficulty—was higher among non-survivors (all p < 0.05). ROC analysis demonstrated strong discriminative performance for global health status (AUC 0.907; p < 0.001), emotional functioning (AUC 0.846; p = 0.002), and social functioning (AUC 0.843; p = 0.003), with moderate performance for physical functioning (AUC 0.737; p = 0.037). Symptom domains showed lower and inverse AUC values, reflecting scale directionality and limited discriminative capacity. Conclusions: Baseline PROs using EORTC QLQ-C30 and BR23 were strongly associated with early pharmacotherapy survival and demonstrated meaningful discriminative ability, particularly in global and functional domains. Integrating PRO assessments before treatment initiation may enhance early risk stratification, guide supportive care, and improve treatment continuity in breast cancer.

Medical SciencesVol. 14(2)
Universitas Airlangga (ID), Rumah Sakit Umum Haji Surabaya (ID), Universitas Dr. Soetomo (ID)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.