QualityRights in medical education to reduce coercion in mental health in Colombia: instrument validation and quasi-experimental study

BACKGROUND: The QualityRights initiative has shown benefits in decreasing coercive practices and enhancing the recognition of human rights in healthcare. AIMS: To translate the World Health Organization's (WHO) QualityRights Practices Questionnaire into Spanish and assess the relationships between coercive practices in healthcare settings, perceptions of mental disorders, and attitudes and commitment to human rights among primary healthcare professionals from multiple disciplines. Also, we sought to compare these variables between trained and untrained professionals, and evaluate longitudinal outcomes of integrating QualityRights training into undergraduate medical education. METHOD: A quasi-experimental study with a non-equivalent control group was conducted. Instruments included the Community Attitudes Toward the Mentally III, Human Rights Exposure in Social Work and Human Rights Engagement in Social Work scales, and the WHO QualityRights Practices Questionnaire. A total of 260 professionals from 12 Colombian regions participated in the study. Multiple linear regression analyses were conducted to examine the effects of the QualityRights initiative on various dimensions related to human rights. RESULTS: < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In Colombia, incorporating the QualityRights initiative into medical education appears to be a promising strategy for reducing stigma, enhancing knowledge and commitment to human rights, and minimising coercive practices in primary mental healthcare.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BJPsych Open
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2026.11042
Primary Topic
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

QualityRights in medical education to reduce coercion in mental health in Colombia: instrument validation and quasi-experimental study

Helena Vélez-Botero, Felipe Agudelo-Hernández, Andrés Camilo Delgado-Reyes
BJPsych Open
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
article

QualityRights in medical education to reduce coercion in mental health in Colombia: instrument validation and quasi-experimental study

Helena Vélez-Botero, Felipe Agudelo-Hernández, Andrés Camilo Delgado-Reyes
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The QualityRights initiative has shown benefits in decreasing coercive practices and enhancing the recognition of human rights in healthcare. AIMS: To translate the World Health Organization's (WHO) QualityRights Practices Questionnaire into Spanish and assess the relationships between coercive practices in healthcare settings, perceptions of mental disorders, and attitudes and commitment to human rights among primary healthcare professionals from multiple disciplines. Also, we sought to compare these variables between trained and untrained professionals, and evaluate longitudinal outcomes of integrating QualityRights training into undergraduate medical education. METHOD: A quasi-experimental study with a non-equivalent control group was conducted. Instruments included the Community Attitudes Toward the Mentally III, Human Rights Exposure in Social Work and Human Rights Engagement in Social Work scales, and the WHO QualityRights Practices Questionnaire. A total of 260 professionals from 12 Colombian regions participated in the study. Multiple linear regression analyses were conducted to examine the effects of the QualityRights initiative on various dimensions related to human rights. RESULTS: < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In Colombia, incorporating the QualityRights initiative into medical education appears to be a promising strategy for reducing stigma, enhancing knowledge and commitment to human rights, and minimising coercive practices in primary mental healthcare.

BJPsych OpenVol. 12(3)
University of Caldas (CO), Universidad Nacional de Colombia (CO), Universidad de Manizales (CO)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.