Optimizing Bare Soil Mosaics for Clay Prediction via Environmental Covariates and Variable Selection

Spatial information on soil clay content addresses critical needs in precision agriculture and soil health assessment worldwide. This study utilizes a mapping workflow for topsoil clay (0–20 cm) across croplands in southern Russia using Sentinel-2 bare soil mosaics and regional covariates representing soil-forming factors. We generated 26 multi-temporal mosaics via per-pixel and per-date approaches and then tested five scenarios with regional covariates in combination with three variable selection techniques: variance inflation factor (VIF), recursive feature elimination (RFE), and modified greedy feature selection (MGFS). We found that among 26 temporal mosaics, the best single mosaic (scenario 1) explained 25% of the clay variation (RMSE = 10.03%, R2 = 0.25, RPD = 1.16). Using only regional covariates selected after VIF and RFE approaches (scenario 2) yielded comparable results (RMSE = 9.77%, R2 = 0.27, RPD = 1.18). Combination of the best bare soil mosaic and all regional covariates without the variable selection method (scenario 3) improved the predictions (RMSE = 9.45%, R2 = 0.33, RPD = 1.24), and with the VIF/RFE application (scenario 4), the model showed slightly worse accuracy (RMSE = 9.65%, R2 = 0.31, RPD = 1.21). MGFS implementation (scenario № 5) boosted the model performance and resulted in the best predictions (RMSE = 8.73%, R2 = 0.42, RPD = 1.34). NIR bands from the bare soil mosaic, and terrain attributes with Landsat and MODIS variables from the regional covariate set were the key variables. We demonstrate that combining multi-temporal Sentinel-2 mosaics with regional covariates, when paired with an appropriate selection strategy, yields superior clay predictions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18101503
Primary Topic
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimizing Bare Soil Mosaics for Clay Prediction via Environmental Covariates and Variable Selection

Azamat Suleymanov, Ilgiz Asylbaev, Nikita Kriuchkov, Ruslan Suleymanov
Remote Sensing
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
article

Optimizing Bare Soil Mosaics for Clay Prediction via Environmental Covariates and Variable Selection

Azamat Suleymanov, Ilgiz Asylbaev, Nikita Kriuchkov, Ruslan Suleymanov
article en

Abstract

Spatial information on soil clay content addresses critical needs in precision agriculture and soil health assessment worldwide. This study utilizes a mapping workflow for topsoil clay (0–20 cm) across croplands in southern Russia using Sentinel-2 bare soil mosaics and regional covariates representing soil-forming factors. We generated 26 multi-temporal mosaics via per-pixel and per-date approaches and then tested five scenarios with regional covariates in combination with three variable selection techniques: variance inflation factor (VIF), recursive feature elimination (RFE), and modified greedy feature selection (MGFS). We found that among 26 temporal mosaics, the best single mosaic (scenario 1) explained 25% of the clay variation (RMSE = 10.03%, R2 = 0.25, RPD = 1.16). Using only regional covariates selected after VIF and RFE approaches (scenario 2) yielded comparable results (RMSE = 9.77%, R2 = 0.27, RPD = 1.18). Combination of the best bare soil mosaic and all regional covariates without the variable selection method (scenario 3) improved the predictions (RMSE = 9.45%, R2 = 0.33, RPD = 1.24), and with the VIF/RFE application (scenario 4), the model showed slightly worse accuracy (RMSE = 9.65%, R2 = 0.31, RPD = 1.21). MGFS implementation (scenario № 5) boosted the model performance and resulted in the best predictions (RMSE = 8.73%, R2 = 0.42, RPD = 1.34). NIR bands from the bare soil mosaic, and terrain attributes with Landsat and MODIS variables from the regional covariate set were the key variables. We demonstrate that combining multi-temporal Sentinel-2 mosaics with regional covariates, when paired with an appropriate selection strategy, yields superior clay predictions.

Remote SensingVol. 18(10)
Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU), Bashkir State Agrarian University (RU), Ufa Institute of Chemistry (RU), Shenzhen MSU-BIT University
Russian Science Foundation
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Soil Geostatistics and Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.