Evaluating the Vertical Accuracy of Global DEMs Using ICESat-2 and Its Cascading Impact on HAND-Based Flood Modeling in a Low-Gradient Coastal Plain

Driven by climate change and population growth, coastal flood risk is rising, making high-precision Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) essential for inundation simulation and risk assessment. Although global open-source DEMs are increasingly available, their regional applicability and uncertainty still require quantitative evaluation. Taking Lianyungang, a coastal city in eastern China, as the study area, this study used ICESat-2 ATL08 laser altimetry as the reference to assess the vertical accuracy of eight mainstream open-source DEMs: the ASTER GDEM, FABDEM, AW3D30 DEM, SRTM DEM, MERIT DEM, NASA DEM, Copernicus DEM, and TanDEM-X DEM. The effects of slope, aspect, and land cover on DEM errors were analyzed, and the Height Above Nearest Drainage (HAND) model was used to evaluate how DEM vertical accuracy and spatial resolution affect flood inundation simulation. The results show that the FABDEM has the highest accuracy (RMSE = 1.24 m; NMAD = 0.49 m), followed by the Copernicus DEM GLO-30 (RMSE = 1.56 m; NMAD = 0.65 m), whereas the ASTER GDEM performs worst (RMSE = 5.36 m; NMAD = 3.69 m). The SRTM DEM systematically underestimates ICESat-2 elevations, with mean and median errors of −1.85 m and −1.80 m, mainly due to acquisition time differences and land-use changes in Lianyungang. DEM errors generally increase with slope, are higher on west-facing slopes, and are larger over water bodies than over cropland and impervious surfaces. HAND simulations show that DEM-derived inundation differences are greatest under low-threshold conditions. At the 1 m HAND threshold, the MERIT DEM produces the largest inundation area (4370.28 km2), while the ASTER GDEM produces the smallest area (3330.53 km2); these differences decrease as the threshold increases. Overall, the FABDEM provides the most accurate flood inundation representation in Lianyungang, while the Copernicus DEM GLO-30 is a reliable alternative.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18101511
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the Vertical Accuracy of Global DEMs Using ICESat-2 and Its Cascading Impact on HAND-Based Flood Modeling in a Low-Gradient Coastal Plain

Dewei Wang, Xue Li, Wenli Qiao, Yiming Sun
Remote Sensing
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
article

Evaluating the Vertical Accuracy of Global DEMs Using ICESat-2 and Its Cascading Impact on HAND-Based Flood Modeling in a Low-Gradient Coastal Plain

Dewei Wang, Xue Li, Wenli Qiao, Yiming Sun
article en

Abstract

Driven by climate change and population growth, coastal flood risk is rising, making high-precision Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) essential for inundation simulation and risk assessment. Although global open-source DEMs are increasingly available, their regional applicability and uncertainty still require quantitative evaluation. Taking Lianyungang, a coastal city in eastern China, as the study area, this study used ICESat-2 ATL08 laser altimetry as the reference to assess the vertical accuracy of eight mainstream open-source DEMs: the ASTER GDEM, FABDEM, AW3D30 DEM, SRTM DEM, MERIT DEM, NASA DEM, Copernicus DEM, and TanDEM-X DEM. The effects of slope, aspect, and land cover on DEM errors were analyzed, and the Height Above Nearest Drainage (HAND) model was used to evaluate how DEM vertical accuracy and spatial resolution affect flood inundation simulation. The results show that the FABDEM has the highest accuracy (RMSE = 1.24 m; NMAD = 0.49 m), followed by the Copernicus DEM GLO-30 (RMSE = 1.56 m; NMAD = 0.65 m), whereas the ASTER GDEM performs worst (RMSE = 5.36 m; NMAD = 3.69 m). The SRTM DEM systematically underestimates ICESat-2 elevations, with mean and median errors of −1.85 m and −1.80 m, mainly due to acquisition time differences and land-use changes in Lianyungang. DEM errors generally increase with slope, are higher on west-facing slopes, and are larger over water bodies than over cropland and impervious surfaces. HAND simulations show that DEM-derived inundation differences are greatest under low-threshold conditions. At the 1 m HAND threshold, the MERIT DEM produces the largest inundation area (4370.28 km2), while the ASTER GDEM produces the smallest area (3330.53 km2); these differences decrease as the threshold increases. Overall, the FABDEM provides the most accurate flood inundation representation in Lianyungang, while the Copernicus DEM GLO-30 is a reliable alternative.

Remote SensingVol. 18(10)
Jiangsu University of Science and Technology (CN), Shenyang Environmental Protection Bureau (CN), College of Marin (US)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration, University of Bristol, Jiangsu Ocean University, U.S. Geological Survey, Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.