Urban Air Mobility and Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Path Planning in Dynamic Urban Environments: A Review

The complexity of three-dimensional (3D) dynamic urban environments poses new challenges to emerging unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) path planning, especially in dense buildings, dynamic obstacles, and multi-UAV collaboration. This paper reviews mainstream 3D path planning algorithms (including RRT, PRM, the ant colony algorithm, the artificial potential field method, and A*) and analyzes their core principles, applicable scenarios, advantages, and disadvantages. The study finds that each algorithm has its disadvantages: RRT lacks optimality, PRM has high computational cost, the ant colony algorithm is poor in real-time performance, APF is prone to local optima, and A* performs well in static environments. Future research should explore hybrid strategies combining multiple algorithms to improve adaptability in dynamic complex environments, providing efficient solutions for urban low-altitude UAV operations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Electronics
Published
2026-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics15101998
Primary Topic
Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Urban Air Mobility and Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Path Planning in Dynamic Urban Environments: A Review

Xiang Lu, Jie Yang, Chuan Sun, Yang Xu et al.
Electronics
Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
article

Urban Air Mobility and Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Path Planning in Dynamic Urban Environments: A Review

Xiang Lu, Jie Yang, Chuan Sun, Yang Xu, Shucai Xu, Zhixiong Li
article en

Abstract

The complexity of three-dimensional (3D) dynamic urban environments poses new challenges to emerging unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) path planning, especially in dense buildings, dynamic obstacles, and multi-UAV collaboration. This paper reviews mainstream 3D path planning algorithms (including RRT, PRM, the ant colony algorithm, the artificial potential field method, and A*) and analyzes their core principles, applicable scenarios, advantages, and disadvantages. The study finds that each algorithm has its disadvantages: RRT lacks optimality, PRM has high computational cost, the ant colony algorithm is poor in real-time performance, APF is prone to local optima, and A* performs well in static environments. Future research should explore hybrid strategies combining multiple algorithms to improve adaptability in dynamic complex environments, providing efficient solutions for urban low-altitude UAV operations.

ElectronicsVol. 15(10)
Energy Foundation (CN), Suzhou Research Institute (CN), Ocean University of China (CN), Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (CN), Tsinghua University (CN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Robotic Path Planning Algorithms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.