The efficacy of strength exercise dosage on pain and disability in people with low back pain: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effects of strength exercise dosages on pain and disability in individuals with low back pain. DESIGN: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, PEDro, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, AMED, and PsycINFO. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials comparing strength exercises of any dosage with minimal interventions for pain and disability in individuals with low back pain of any duration. Two reviewers independently screened trials, extracted data, assessed quality, and evaluated evidence using the GRADE framework. Mean differences with 95% CIs were reported. RESULTS: Eight trials were included in the qualitative analysis, five in the quantitative analysis. All studies included in the meta-analysis compared exercise to minimal interventions. No studies regarding specific spine conditions or with pain duration of less than three months were included. Lumbar extension exercises (specific exercises; pain: -19.6 [-25.4 to -13.7]; disability:-12.5 [-14.9 to -10.1]), higher exercise intensities (> 60% 1 RM; pain: -19.3 [-27.0 to -11.6]; disability: -14.2 [-15.7 to -12.8]), lower frequencies (= once per week; pain: -19.3 [-27.0 to -11.6]; disability: -11.8 [-16.2 to -7.5]), and shorter treatment durations (< 3 months; pain: -19.9 [-26.0 to -13.8]; disability: -13.4 [-15.2 to -11.6]) presented statistically significant results in the reduction of both outcomes. Confidence on the evidence was low to very low. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrated statistically significant results that strength exercises with high intensity, low frequency, and that focus on back extensor muscles have effect on reducing pain and disability in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain. Overall evidence quality was low to very low. Future research should improve reporting of exercise variables in order to refine dosage recommendations. PROSPERO AND OPEN SCIENCE FRAMEWORK REGISTRATION NUMBERS: CRD42024500944. OSF DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/D34TJ .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Spine Journal
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-026-09901-5
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The efficacy of strength exercise dosage on pain and disability in people with low back pain: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Luana Rocha Paulo, Vinícius Cunha Oliveira, Flávio de Castro Magalhães, Bianca Martins Lourenço et al.
European Spine Journal
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

The efficacy of strength exercise dosage on pain and disability in people with low back pain: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Luana Rocha Paulo, Vinícius Cunha Oliveira, Flávio de Castro Magalhães, Bianca Martins Lourenço, Gabriel Mader de Oliveira
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the effects of strength exercise dosages on pain and disability in individuals with low back pain. DESIGN: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, PEDro, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, AMED, and PsycINFO. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials comparing strength exercises of any dosage with minimal interventions for pain and disability in individuals with low back pain of any duration. Two reviewers independently screened trials, extracted data, assessed quality, and evaluated evidence using the GRADE framework. Mean differences with 95% CIs were reported. RESULTS: Eight trials were included in the qualitative analysis, five in the quantitative analysis. All studies included in the meta-analysis compared exercise to minimal interventions. No studies regarding specific spine conditions or with pain duration of less than three months were included. Lumbar extension exercises (specific exercises; pain: -19.6 [-25.4 to -13.7]; disability:-12.5 [-14.9 to -10.1]), higher exercise intensities (> 60% 1 RM; pain: -19.3 [-27.0 to -11.6]; disability: -14.2 [-15.7 to -12.8]), lower frequencies (= once per week; pain: -19.3 [-27.0 to -11.6]; disability: -11.8 [-16.2 to -7.5]), and shorter treatment durations (< 3 months; pain: -19.9 [-26.0 to -13.8]; disability: -13.4 [-15.2 to -11.6]) presented statistically significant results in the reduction of both outcomes. Confidence on the evidence was low to very low. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrated statistically significant results that strength exercises with high intensity, low frequency, and that focus on back extensor muscles have effect on reducing pain and disability in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain. Overall evidence quality was low to very low. Future research should improve reporting of exercise variables in order to refine dosage recommendations. PROSPERO AND OPEN SCIENCE FRAMEWORK REGISTRATION NUMBERS: CRD42024500944. OSF DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/D34TJ .

European Spine Journal
University of New Mexico (US), Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri (BR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.