Predicting biliary complications after liver transplantation: a machine learning and nomogram-based exploratory study

BACKGROUND: Accurate risk stratification of biliary complications (BCs) after liver transplantation (LT) remains challenging. This study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning (ML) and nomogram framework comprising a ML-based web calculator and a clinically interpretable nomogram for post-LT BCs. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 133 LT patients (2011-2025), randomly split into training (n = 94) and validation (n = 39) sets. Predictors were identified using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression. Eight ML algorithms were trained with 5-fold cross-validation. Performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), Brier score, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Additionally, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were employed to visualize feature importance. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of BCs was 38.3%. Four independent predictors were identified: hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) emerged as a protective factor, while intraoperative crystalloid infusion, preoperative partial hepatectomy, and antiviral therapy were risk factors. Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) yielded the highest discrimination in the validation set (AUC 0.753), outperforming standard logistic regression (AUC 0.701). The LightGBM model exhibited satisfactory calibration (Brier score = 0.212) and clinical net benefit. The nomogram provided a static scoring tool, whereas the LightGBM-based web calculator offered precise individual risk estimation. CONCLUSIONS: As an exploratory, proof-of-concept framework and an internal validation effort, the LightGBM-based web calculator offers exploratory but promising predictive accuracy for post-LT BCs, while the nomogram facilitates bedside decision-making through visual interpretability. This combined framework supports a transition from reactive management to proactive, risk-stratified surveillance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Gastroenterology
Published
2026-05-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-026-04924-0
Primary Topic
Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting biliary complications after liver transplantation: a machine learning and nomogram-based exploratory study

Kezhen Zong, Zuotian Huang, Zhongjun Wu, Shanshan Li et al.
BMC Gastroenterology
Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
article

Predicting biliary complications after liver transplantation: a machine learning and nomogram-based exploratory study

Kezhen Zong, Zuotian Huang, Zhongjun Wu, Shanshan Li, Han Zhang, Minghang Zhang, Jinxi Chen
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accurate risk stratification of biliary complications (BCs) after liver transplantation (LT) remains challenging. This study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning (ML) and nomogram framework comprising a ML-based web calculator and a clinically interpretable nomogram for post-LT BCs. METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed 133 LT patients (2011-2025), randomly split into training (n = 94) and validation (n = 39) sets. Predictors were identified using Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression. Eight ML algorithms were trained with 5-fold cross-validation. Performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), Brier score, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Additionally, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) were employed to visualize feature importance. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of BCs was 38.3%. Four independent predictors were identified: hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) emerged as a protective factor, while intraoperative crystalloid infusion, preoperative partial hepatectomy, and antiviral therapy were risk factors. Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) yielded the highest discrimination in the validation set (AUC 0.753), outperforming standard logistic regression (AUC 0.701). The LightGBM model exhibited satisfactory calibration (Brier score = 0.212) and clinical net benefit. The nomogram provided a static scoring tool, whereas the LightGBM-based web calculator offered precise individual risk estimation. CONCLUSIONS: As an exploratory, proof-of-concept framework and an internal validation effort, the LightGBM-based web calculator offers exploratory but promising predictive accuracy for post-LT BCs, while the nomogram facilitates bedside decision-making through visual interpretability. This combined framework supports a transition from reactive management to proactive, risk-stratified surveillance.

BMC Gastroenterology
The Affiliated Yongchuan Hospital of Chongqing Medical University (CN), Chongqing Cancer Hospital (CN), Chongqing Medical University (CN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.