Mass Flow Sensing and Yield Mapping for Forage Mowing Equipment

Yield monitoring in forage production is typically limited to chopping or baling operations, where spatial resolution is often reduced by windrow merging. This study evaluated the feasibility of estimating mass flow rate (MFR) and generating spatial yield maps at the mowing stage using sensors integrated into a windrower. Conditioning roll speed, swath shield impact force, and the displacement of spring-loaded vanes (fingers) in the crop flow were evaluated during alfalfa harvest and calibrated against measured MFR. Model performance was assessed using cross-validation, and spatial fidelity was evaluated using experimental variograms and kriged yield maps. The average MFR was 19 kg·s−1 with a range of 4 to 55 kg·s−1. Conditioning roll speed provided the most robust and transferable predictor of MFR (R2 = 0.89, RMSE = 3.4 kg·s−1), consistently outperforming impact force (R2 = 0.70, RMSE = 1.9 kg·s−1) and finger displacement (R2 = 0.82, RMSE = 4.3 kg·s−1), which were more sensitive to machine dynamics and sensor placement. Validation of the roll-speed model using an independent dataset resulted in an R2 = 0.87 and RMSE of 2.62 kg·s−1. Yield maps derived from roll-speed-based models exhibited clear spatial structure with correlation lengths of approximately 25–40 m, whereas the finger displacement model exhibited higher nugget effects. Yield mapping with the forage harvester showed reduced spatial fidelity compared to mowing stage estimates, as windrow merging prior to chopping caused spatial averaging that diminished recoverable fine-scale yield variability. These results demonstrate that yield monitoring at the mowing stage enabled yield estimates to complement downstream harvest data and improve characterization of within-field yield variability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AgriEngineering
Published
2026-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering8050186
Primary Topic
Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mass Flow Sensing and Yield Mapping for Forage Mowing Equipment

Brian M. Huenink, Walter M. Schlesser, Kevin J. Shinners, Matthew F. Digman et al.
AgriEngineering
Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics
article

Mass Flow Sensing and Yield Mapping for Forage Mowing Equipment

Brian M. Huenink, Walter M. Schlesser, Kevin J. Shinners, Matthew F. Digman, Jacob R. Flick
article en

Abstract

Yield monitoring in forage production is typically limited to chopping or baling operations, where spatial resolution is often reduced by windrow merging. This study evaluated the feasibility of estimating mass flow rate (MFR) and generating spatial yield maps at the mowing stage using sensors integrated into a windrower. Conditioning roll speed, swath shield impact force, and the displacement of spring-loaded vanes (fingers) in the crop flow were evaluated during alfalfa harvest and calibrated against measured MFR. Model performance was assessed using cross-validation, and spatial fidelity was evaluated using experimental variograms and kriged yield maps. The average MFR was 19 kg·s−1 with a range of 4 to 55 kg·s−1. Conditioning roll speed provided the most robust and transferable predictor of MFR (R2 = 0.89, RMSE = 3.4 kg·s−1), consistently outperforming impact force (R2 = 0.70, RMSE = 1.9 kg·s−1) and finger displacement (R2 = 0.82, RMSE = 4.3 kg·s−1), which were more sensitive to machine dynamics and sensor placement. Validation of the roll-speed model using an independent dataset resulted in an R2 = 0.87 and RMSE of 2.62 kg·s−1. Yield maps derived from roll-speed-based models exhibited clear spatial structure with correlation lengths of approximately 25–40 m, whereas the finger displacement model exhibited higher nugget effects. Yield mapping with the forage harvester showed reduced spatial fidelity compared to mowing stage estimates, as windrow merging prior to chopping caused spatial averaging that diminished recoverable fine-scale yield variability. These results demonstrate that yield monitoring at the mowing stage enabled yield estimates to complement downstream harvest data and improve characterization of within-field yield variability.

AgriEngineeringVol. 8(5)
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), University of Dubuque (US), John Deere (United States) (US), John Deere (Germany) (DE)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.