Living Through Change: Boredom and the Rhetoric of Modern Experience

After a brief meditation on how a pluralistic and anti-essentialist approach to Boredom Studies can help us navigate challenges that characterize interdisciplinary knowledge formations more generally, this paper takes up the theoretical and practical problem of thinking boredom as a historically situated, embodied experience (or failure of experience): not as a timeless crisis of meaning, but rather as a historically specific configuration of empty, meaningless time. As I show, boredom’s seeming ubiquity amidst the ongoing social, cultural, and technological transformation that defines the modern world is at once historically and philosophically significant. As an index of the problems of meaning that accompany the challenges of living through historic change, boredom today at once resembles and differs from past forms and permutations of the experience. Expanding our sights to encompass the intertwining varieties of malaise in the contemporary world—not just boredom, but loneliness, anxiety, depression, despair, and all their siblings—can help counter the personalization of alienation by revealing the axes connecting individualized suffering to the social, political, and ecological challenges of our time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20098118
Primary Topic
Mind wandering and attention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Living Through Change: Boredom and the Rhetoric of Modern Experience

Goodstein Elizabeth S.
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Mind wandering and attention
article

Living Through Change: Boredom and the Rhetoric of Modern Experience

Goodstein Elizabeth S.
article en

Abstract

After a brief meditation on how a pluralistic and anti-essentialist approach to Boredom Studies can help us navigate challenges that characterize interdisciplinary knowledge formations more generally, this paper takes up the theoretical and practical problem of thinking boredom as a historically situated, embodied experience (or failure of experience): not as a timeless crisis of meaning, but rather as a historically specific configuration of empty, meaningless time. As I show, boredom’s seeming ubiquity amidst the ongoing social, cultural, and technological transformation that defines the modern world is at once historically and philosophically significant. As an index of the problems of meaning that accompany the challenges of living through historic change, boredom today at once resembles and differs from past forms and permutations of the experience. Expanding our sights to encompass the intertwining varieties of malaise in the contemporary world—not just boredom, but loneliness, anxiety, depression, despair, and all their siblings—can help counter the personalization of alienation by revealing the axes connecting individualized suffering to the social, political, and ecological challenges of our time.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Emory University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Mind wandering and attention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Living Through Change: Boredom and the Rhetoric of Modern Experience — Goodstein Elizabeth S. · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS