Meta-analyses in entrepreneurship research: the state of the art and future directions for validity assessment

In entrepreneurship research, meta-analysis has been used both for describing phenomena and for drawing inferences. Meanwhile, this study identified 92 meta-analyses that have been conducted in the domain of entrepreneurship. This paper reviews these analyses with two main purposes. First, this paper provides a state-of-the-art summary of meta-analysis findings to show the empirical evidence on concepts, relationships and theories. Such evidence leads to practice recommendations. This paper also points to areas that may need future meta-analyses. Second, this paper provides a state-of-the-art summary on how meta-analyses are conducted, what methodological choices need to be considered, and how meta-analysis results should be interpreted. The authors hope that this paper also provides some ideas and guidelines on how to proceed with rigor into the future of meta-analysis in entrepreneurship research and how to arrive at valid inferences from meta-analyses conducted in the field.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship
Published
2026-04-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ftent-02-2025-0131
Primary Topic
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Meta-analyses in entrepreneurship research: the state of the art and future directions for validity assessment

Andreas Rauch, Michael Fresé, Macarena Tabilo
Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
article

Meta-analyses in entrepreneurship research: the state of the art and future directions for validity assessment

Andreas Rauch, Michael Fresé, Macarena Tabilo
article en

Abstract

In entrepreneurship research, meta-analysis has been used both for describing phenomena and for drawing inferences. Meanwhile, this study identified 92 meta-analyses that have been conducted in the domain of entrepreneurship. This paper reviews these analyses with two main purposes. First, this paper provides a state-of-the-art summary of meta-analysis findings to show the empirical evidence on concepts, relationships and theories. Such evidence leads to practice recommendations. This paper also points to areas that may need future meta-analyses. Second, this paper provides a state-of-the-art summary on how meta-analyses are conducted, what methodological choices need to be considered, and how meta-analysis results should be interpreted. The authors hope that this paper also provides some ideas and guidelines on how to proceed with rigor into the future of meta-analysis in entrepreneurship research and how to arrive at valid inferences from meta-analyses conducted in the field.

Foundations and Trends® in EntrepreneurshipVol. 22(1)
Leuphana University of Lüneburg (DE), Johannes Kepler University of Linz (AT), Queensland University of Technology (AU), Audencia Business School (FR), The University of Queensland (AU), Asia School of Business (MY)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Meta-analyses in entrepreneurship research: the state of the art and future directions for validity assessment — Andreas Rauch, Michael Fresé, et al. · Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS