No Need to Feel
This article presents five arguments against the idea that non-sentience is a sufficient condition for not considering abortion an immoral act: the formal paradox argument, the third-person argument, the abortionist status argument, the implicit antinatalist premise argument, and the manipulation argument. These five arguments do not disqualify pro-abortion approaches that do not use the element of non-sentience but suggest that it would be appropriate for these approaches to also consider them. The existence of these other pro-abortion arguments shows that non-sentience is not a necessary condition either for trying to show that abortion is not immoral.
Authors
- Júlio Cabrera
Institutions
- Universidade de Brasília (BR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
- Published
- 2026-05-11
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0963180126100097
- Primary Topic
- Reproductive Health and Technologies
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- University of Cambridge