Adult deaf sign language users and audiology services: a scoping review on cultural competence practices

OBJECTIVE: To examine literature on cultural competence in audiology services for Deaf adult sign language users, identifying themes, evidence gaps, and systemic barriers to inclusive care. DESIGN: Scoping review following JBI methodology and PRISM-ScR guidance, with a narrative synthesis and a light-touch quality assessment. STUDY SAMPLE: Comprehensive searches in CINAHL, EMBASE, Project MUSE, PsycINFO, PubMed, and SSCI, supplemented by hand-searching and grey literature, identified 575 sources, of which 13 met inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Four themes were identified: (1) The gap between intent and practice in sign language use (2) Interpreter access: inconsistency and over-reliance; (3) Recognising Deaf signers as a cultural-linguistic minority and (4) Barriers to fostering a culturally competent environment. CONCLUSIONS: This review synthesises evidence on culturally competent audiology care for Deaf signers. Findings highlight systemic exclusion of Deaf individuals as a cultural-linguistic minority and over-reliance on interpreters, which may create superficial access without broader cultural understanding. There is a critical need for whole-service research to inform more inclusive audiology practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Audiology
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2026.2660209
Primary Topic
Hearing Impairment and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adult deaf sign language users and audiology services: a scoping review on cultural competence practices

Alys Young, Kevin J. Munro, Celia Hulme, Katherine; id_orcid 0000-0003-0458-5715 Rogers
International Journal of Audiology
Hearing Impairment and Communication
article

Adult deaf sign language users and audiology services: a scoping review on cultural competence practices

Alys Young, Kevin J. Munro, Celia Hulme, Katherine; id_orcid 0000-0003-0458-5715 Rogers
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine literature on cultural competence in audiology services for Deaf adult sign language users, identifying themes, evidence gaps, and systemic barriers to inclusive care. DESIGN: Scoping review following JBI methodology and PRISM-ScR guidance, with a narrative synthesis and a light-touch quality assessment. STUDY SAMPLE: Comprehensive searches in CINAHL, EMBASE, Project MUSE, PsycINFO, PubMed, and SSCI, supplemented by hand-searching and grey literature, identified 575 sources, of which 13 met inclusion criteria. RESULTS: Four themes were identified: (1) The gap between intent and practice in sign language use (2) Interpreter access: inconsistency and over-reliance; (3) Recognising Deaf signers as a cultural-linguistic minority and (4) Barriers to fostering a culturally competent environment. CONCLUSIONS: This review synthesises evidence on culturally competent audiology care for Deaf signers. Findings highlight systemic exclusion of Deaf individuals as a cultural-linguistic minority and over-reliance on interpreters, which may create superficial access without broader cultural understanding. There is a critical need for whole-service research to inform more inclusive audiology practice.

International Journal of Audiology
University of the Witwatersrand (ZA), Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (GB), University of Manchester (GB), Soran University (IQ)
National Institute for Health and Care Research
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Hearing Impairment and Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.