Real-World Ketone Testing Patterns Among People Using FreeStyle Libre

OBJECTIVE: Ketone testing behavior in relation to glucose control is not well characterized. We aimed to describe ketone testing patterns and assess glucose control among individuals using a FreeStyle Libre (FSL) reader and blood ketone test strips in a real-world dataset of over 2.5 million ketone readings. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Historical glucose and ketone data from September 2014 to September 2024 were analyzed. As data are recorded for individual readers, the analysis is performed by readers. Ketone excursions were categorized by initial ketone level: ≤0.5, 0.6-1.4, 1.5-2.9, and ≥3.0 mmol/L. Glucose concentrations were evaluated 24 h before and after the initial ketone test. Ketone test frequency and concentrations within 72 h post-test were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 92.4% of readers never recorded a ketone test, and only 5% of readers performed a ketone test when glucose exceeded 250 mg/dL. Users with ketone levels ≥3.0 mmol/L had higher glucose concentrations in the 24 h preceding the ketone test. Among those with ketones ≥1.5 mmol/L, ketone testing was typically delayed by 5-8 h after glucose surpassed 250 mg/dL, and retesting ketones within 24-72 h was rare. CONCLUSIONS: Most readers did not demonstrate adherence to standard-of-care recommendations for ketone monitoring and infrequently recheck ketones after elevated readings. Incorporation of continuous ketone monitoring into FSL would address limitations with current ketone testing methodologies and adherence to ketone monitoring guidelines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15209156261446059
Primary Topic
Diet and metabolism studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Real-World Ketone Testing Patterns Among People Using FreeStyle Libre

Casey C. Curl, Farhan Quadri, R Bergenstal, Naunihal Virdi et al.
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Diet and metabolism studies
article

Real-World Ketone Testing Patterns Among People Using FreeStyle Libre

Casey C. Curl, Farhan Quadri, R Bergenstal, Naunihal Virdi, Samia Rahman
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Ketone testing behavior in relation to glucose control is not well characterized. We aimed to describe ketone testing patterns and assess glucose control among individuals using a FreeStyle Libre (FSL) reader and blood ketone test strips in a real-world dataset of over 2.5 million ketone readings. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Historical glucose and ketone data from September 2014 to September 2024 were analyzed. As data are recorded for individual readers, the analysis is performed by readers. Ketone excursions were categorized by initial ketone level: ≤0.5, 0.6-1.4, 1.5-2.9, and ≥3.0 mmol/L. Glucose concentrations were evaluated 24 h before and after the initial ketone test. Ketone test frequency and concentrations within 72 h post-test were also assessed. RESULTS: A total of 92.4% of readers never recorded a ketone test, and only 5% of readers performed a ketone test when glucose exceeded 250 mg/dL. Users with ketone levels ≥3.0 mmol/L had higher glucose concentrations in the 24 h preceding the ketone test. Among those with ketones ≥1.5 mmol/L, ketone testing was typically delayed by 5-8 h after glucose surpassed 250 mg/dL, and retesting ketones within 24-72 h was rare. CONCLUSIONS: Most readers did not demonstrate adherence to standard-of-care recommendations for ketone monitoring and infrequently recheck ketones after elevated readings. Incorporation of continuous ketone monitoring into FSL would address limitations with current ketone testing methodologies and adherence to ketone monitoring guidelines.

Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Diabetes Care Center (US), Abbott Diabetes Care (United States), HealthPartners (US)
Abbott Diabetes Care
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Diet and metabolism studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.