Do Routine Gastric and Duodenal Biopsies Add Value in Patients with Eosinophilic Esophagitis? Evidence from a Large Single-Center Case Registry

Background/Objectives: The recommendation of routine gastric and duodenal biopsies at index endoscopy on suspicion of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) remains controversial because of the limited supporting evidence. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence, clinical relevance, and predictors of gastric and duodenal histopathology in a large real-world EoE cohort. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included adult and pediatric patients with EoE diagnosed between 2001 and 2024 and enrolled in the EoE CONNECT registry. Gastric and/or duodenal biopsies obtained at diagnosis or follow-up were reviewed. Histologic findings were classified into specific diagnostic categories and analyzed according to clinical presentation, endoscopic features, and age group. Results: We evaluated 340 patients (35.7% children), of whom 88.5% underwent both gastric and duodenal biopsies. The overall diagnostic yield for extra-esophageal findings was 20.9%, predominantly Helicobacter pylori-associated gastritis (18.8%), but with a very low yield of clinically meaningful diagnoses such as celiac disease (0.6%) and eosinophilic gastritis (0.3%). Symptoms and endoscopic abnormalities were not significantly associated with pathological findings (p=0.11). Moreover, age-stratified analysis revealed no significant differences in specific diagnoses, although patients with pathological extra-esophageal biopsies were significantly older (p<0.001). Follow-up biopsies demonstrated resolution of most pathological findings after the initial diagnosis, with Helicobacter pylori-associated gastritis accounting for the majority of cases that resolved. Conclusions: Routine extra-esophageal biopsies in the context of patients with EoE have a low diagnostic yield and rarely alter clinical management, regardless of age. Therefore, our findings advocate for a selective rather than universal approach to extra-esophageal sampling in patients with EoE.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16101446
Primary Topic
Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do Routine Gastric and Duodenal Biopsies Add Value in Patients with Eosinophilic Esophagitis? Evidence from a Large Single-Center Case Registry

Elena Grueso-Navarro, Rocío Juárez-Tosina, Laura Arias‐González, Victoria Úbeda-Vargas et al.
Diagnostics
Eosinophilic Esophagitis
article

Do Routine Gastric and Duodenal Biopsies Add Value in Patients with Eosinophilic Esophagitis? Evidence from a Large Single-Center Case Registry

Elena Grueso-Navarro, Rocío Juárez-Tosina, Laura Arias‐González, Victoria Úbeda-Vargas, Emilio J. Laserna-Mendieta, Alfredo J. Lucendo
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: The recommendation of routine gastric and duodenal biopsies at index endoscopy on suspicion of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) remains controversial because of the limited supporting evidence. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence, clinical relevance, and predictors of gastric and duodenal histopathology in a large real-world EoE cohort. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included adult and pediatric patients with EoE diagnosed between 2001 and 2024 and enrolled in the EoE CONNECT registry. Gastric and/or duodenal biopsies obtained at diagnosis or follow-up were reviewed. Histologic findings were classified into specific diagnostic categories and analyzed according to clinical presentation, endoscopic features, and age group. Results: We evaluated 340 patients (35.7% children), of whom 88.5% underwent both gastric and duodenal biopsies. The overall diagnostic yield for extra-esophageal findings was 20.9%, predominantly Helicobacter pylori-associated gastritis (18.8%), but with a very low yield of clinically meaningful diagnoses such as celiac disease (0.6%) and eosinophilic gastritis (0.3%). Symptoms and endoscopic abnormalities were not significantly associated with pathological findings (p=0.11). Moreover, age-stratified analysis revealed no significant differences in specific diagnoses, although patients with pathological extra-esophageal biopsies were significantly older (p<0.001). Follow-up biopsies demonstrated resolution of most pathological findings after the initial diagnosis, with Helicobacter pylori-associated gastritis accounting for the majority of cases that resolved. Conclusions: Routine extra-esophageal biopsies in the context of patients with EoE have a low diagnostic yield and rarely alter clinical management, regardless of age. Therefore, our findings advocate for a selective rather than universal approach to extra-esophageal sampling in patients with EoE.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(10)
Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES), Hospital San Juan de la Cruz (ES), Hospital General de Tomelloso (ES), Hospital Universitario de La Princesa (ES), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (ES)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Eosinophilic Esophagitis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.