Normative Discrimination and the Gender Binary: Negative Evaluations of People with Nonconventional Pronouns

Pronoun sharing has become a common inclusion practice in U.S. schools and workplaces. Drawing on normative discrimination theories, however, we predict that pronoun sharing can lead to negative evaluations of people who share nonconventional pronouns. In a preregistered survey experiment (N = 1,516), participants rated a fictitious potential teammate whose name and pronouns were varied. Participants reported significantly less comfort working with a person with nonconventional pronouns and perceived them as a significantly worse teammate than someone with either conventional pronouns or no pronouns, effects that were mediated by the perception that people with nonconventional pronouns are less warm and more interpersonally demanding. These negative perceptions were significantly more common among conservative respondents, whereas liberal respondents expressed bias toward people who did not share pronouns. In open responses, gender-minority participants described pronoun-sharing practices as potentially either inclusive or exposing. Our findings point to the importance of ensuring pronoun sharing is voluntary.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Psychology Quarterly
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01902725261437032
Primary Topic
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Normative Discrimination and the Gender Binary: Negative Evaluations of People with Nonconventional Pronouns

Shelley J. Correll, Aliya Saperstein, Chloe Grace Hart
Social Psychology Quarterly
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
article

Normative Discrimination and the Gender Binary: Negative Evaluations of People with Nonconventional Pronouns

Shelley J. Correll, Aliya Saperstein, Chloe Grace Hart
article en

Abstract

Pronoun sharing has become a common inclusion practice in U.S. schools and workplaces. Drawing on normative discrimination theories, however, we predict that pronoun sharing can lead to negative evaluations of people who share nonconventional pronouns. In a preregistered survey experiment (N = 1,516), participants rated a fictitious potential teammate whose name and pronouns were varied. Participants reported significantly less comfort working with a person with nonconventional pronouns and perceived them as a significantly worse teammate than someone with either conventional pronouns or no pronouns, effects that were mediated by the perception that people with nonconventional pronouns are less warm and more interpersonally demanding. These negative perceptions were significantly more common among conservative respondents, whereas liberal respondents expressed bias toward people who did not share pronouns. In open responses, gender-minority participants described pronoun-sharing practices as potentially either inclusive or exposing. Our findings point to the importance of ensuring pronoun sharing is voluntary.

Social Psychology Quarterly
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US), Stanford University (US)
Reduced inequalities, Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.