Chlorhexidine‐Alcohol Versus Povidone‐Iodine for Surgical Site Infection Prevention in Abdominal Surgery in Low‐ and Middle‐Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections remain disproportionately common in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed evidence comparing chlorhexidine-alcohol (CHG-ALC) and povidone-iodine (PI) for preoperative skin antisepsis in abdominal surgery in LMICs. METHODS: , Cochran's Q statistics, Egger's regression, and funnel plot-based methods. RESULTS: = 90.8%). CONCLUSION: CHG-ALC appears more effective than PI for reducing SSI after abdominal surgery in LMICs overall, with the most consistent evidence observed in South Asia. However, evidence from sub-Saharan Africa remains limited and heterogeneous. These findings support context-specific implementation and the need for additional African trials focused on abdominal procedures and clearly defined wound classes.
Authors
- Jackson Kakooza
- Denis Bitamazire (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9604-4314)
- Ibrahim Bwaga (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0732-162X)
- Sedrick Bukyana
- Catherine R Lewis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8434-178X)
- Theoneste Hakizimana (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1294-2981)
- Abass Alao Safiriyu
- Umaru Kabuye
- Michael Mugenyi
- Prosper Akankwasa
- John Turyagumanawe
- Ahmed Kiswezi Kazigo
- Rashid Naziru
- Enock Mukiibi
- Bienfait V. Mumbere
- Emmanuel Ibudi
- Luis Nyende
Institutions
- Islamic University in Uganda (UG)
- Kampala International University (UG)
- Hoima Hospital (UG)
- Kitovu Hospital (UG)
- Makerere University (UG)
Publication Details
- Journal
- World Journal of Surgery
- Published
- 2026-05-11
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/wjs.70409
- Primary Topic
- Surgical site infection prevention
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00