Unpacking the Farmland Capitalization Effect of Ethanol Establishment

ABSTRACT We unpack the impact of expansions in ethanol production—as measured by proximity to newly constructed ethanol plants and capacity expansions—on farmland values using land transaction data from Kansas in combination with modern causal inference techniques. We first show that Two‐Way Fixed Effects (TWFE) estimation with data aggregated to the county and township level leads to an average land value effect ranging from 4% to 9% for parcels located within 50 km of an ethanol plant. However, using a modern difference‐in‐difference estimator, we find no evidence of a statistically significant effect on farmland values. Furthermore, our analysis reveals no indication that land value proximity premiums rose following the 2005 Energy Policy Act. We find evidence that the average treatment effect detected by conventional TWFE is largely driven by land transactions in the proximity of ethanol plants that were established prior to the 2005 Energy Policy Act. Proximity to ethanol plants established after the 2005 Energy Policy Act has a smaller and less robust effect on land values.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.70085
Primary Topic
Agricultural Economics and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unpacking the Farmland Capitalization Effect of Ethanol Establishment

Jisang Yu, Gabriel S. Sampson
Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy
Agricultural Economics and Policy
article

Unpacking the Farmland Capitalization Effect of Ethanol Establishment

Jisang Yu, Gabriel S. Sampson
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT We unpack the impact of expansions in ethanol production—as measured by proximity to newly constructed ethanol plants and capacity expansions—on farmland values using land transaction data from Kansas in combination with modern causal inference techniques. We first show that Two‐Way Fixed Effects (TWFE) estimation with data aggregated to the county and township level leads to an average land value effect ranging from 4% to 9% for parcels located within 50 km of an ethanol plant. However, using a modern difference‐in‐difference estimator, we find no evidence of a statistically significant effect on farmland values. Furthermore, our analysis reveals no indication that land value proximity premiums rose following the 2005 Energy Policy Act. We find evidence that the average treatment effect detected by conventional TWFE is largely driven by land transactions in the proximity of ethanol plants that were established prior to the 2005 Energy Policy Act. Proximity to ethanol plants established after the 2005 Energy Policy Act has a smaller and less robust effect on land values.

Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy
Kansas State University (US), Korea University (KR)
Korea University
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Agricultural Economics and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Unpacking the Farmland Capitalization Effect of Ethanol Establishment — Jisang Yu, Gabriel S. Sampson · Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS