Human wildlife conflict systematic review in Ethiopia

Abstract In Ethiopia, human-wildlife conflict is a major problem where most people depend on domestic animals and crops. These activities exacerbate human-wildlife conflict. Therefore, this systematic review examined human-wildlife conflict in Ethiopia by synthesizing data from 64 studies conducted between 2009 and 30 August 2025. The papers were searched in major academic databases like Google scholar and Scopus. A total of 53 wildlife species were identified as crop raiders and livestock predators across different geographical locations of Ethiopia. Human-wildlife conflict across geographical locations in Ethiopia was driven by several factors. Among these causes, crop raiding (33 of 64 studies) and livestock depredation (30 of 64 studies) were the most frequently reported sources of conflict. Crop raiding was the leading source of human-wildlife conflict. The northern regions of the country recorded the highest crop loss, with an average of 120.2 kg per household per year. This was due to agricultural expansions around wildlife habitats. Livestock loss caused by wildlife varies across different geographical locations of the country. In the eastern parts of the country, the highest livestock loss was recorded, with an average loss of 14 number of livestock per household year per. Local communities used several techniques to manage human-wildlife conflict. Among these management techniques, guarding, physical barriers, symbols, and chasing were the most commonly used methods. Guarding was the primary human-wildlife conflict management technique. The perceptions and attitudes of local communities towards wildlife populations varied across the regions. In all regions of the country, local communities generally showed a negative attitude towards the wildlife population. Therefore, integrated management approaches, coordination, and awareness creation for the local communities are essential.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Sustainability
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-026-03194-w
Primary Topic
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Human wildlife conflict systematic review in Ethiopia

Binega Derebe, Aragaw Workie, Yalew Bizu, Belgie Abebaw
Discover Sustainability
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
article

Human wildlife conflict systematic review in Ethiopia

Binega Derebe, Aragaw Workie, Yalew Bizu, Belgie Abebaw
article en

Abstract

Abstract In Ethiopia, human-wildlife conflict is a major problem where most people depend on domestic animals and crops. These activities exacerbate human-wildlife conflict. Therefore, this systematic review examined human-wildlife conflict in Ethiopia by synthesizing data from 64 studies conducted between 2009 and 30 August 2025. The papers were searched in major academic databases like Google scholar and Scopus. A total of 53 wildlife species were identified as crop raiders and livestock predators across different geographical locations of Ethiopia. Human-wildlife conflict across geographical locations in Ethiopia was driven by several factors. Among these causes, crop raiding (33 of 64 studies) and livestock depredation (30 of 64 studies) were the most frequently reported sources of conflict. Crop raiding was the leading source of human-wildlife conflict. The northern regions of the country recorded the highest crop loss, with an average of 120.2 kg per household per year. This was due to agricultural expansions around wildlife habitats. Livestock loss caused by wildlife varies across different geographical locations of the country. In the eastern parts of the country, the highest livestock loss was recorded, with an average loss of 14 number of livestock per household year per. Local communities used several techniques to manage human-wildlife conflict. Among these management techniques, guarding, physical barriers, symbols, and chasing were the most commonly used methods. Guarding was the primary human-wildlife conflict management technique. The perceptions and attitudes of local communities towards wildlife populations varied across the regions. In all regions of the country, local communities generally showed a negative attitude towards the wildlife population. Therefore, integrated management approaches, coordination, and awareness creation for the local communities are essential.

Discover Sustainability
Jigjiga University (ET), Debark University (ET)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Human wildlife conflict systematic review in Ethiopia — Binega Derebe, Aragaw Workie, et al. · Discover Sustainability (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS