Key Considerations in Bioethics from a Cultural Perspective

This article critically examines the conceptual, historical, and epistemological foundations of bioethics as a transdisciplinary field that emerged in response to the ethical tensions produced by technoscientific development. Through an analytical and interpretative approach, the paper revisits the historical events that shaped modern bioethics and the contemporary challenges that arise from the expansion of biomedical and technological interventions. The analysis highlights persistent dilemmas involving autonomy, paternalism, vulnerability, and intercultural asymmetries, as well as the ethical impact of technoscience on the reconfiguration of life, death, and human nature. The article argues for a pluralistic and adaptive bioethics capable of sustaining epistemic vigilance and guiding decision-making processes in diverse and complex sociocultural contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Culture
Published
2026-05-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/culture2020011
Primary Topic
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Key Considerations in Bioethics from a Cultural Perspective

Álvaro Acevedo-Merlano
Culture
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
article

Key Considerations in Bioethics from a Cultural Perspective

Álvaro Acevedo-Merlano
article en

Abstract

This article critically examines the conceptual, historical, and epistemological foundations of bioethics as a transdisciplinary field that emerged in response to the ethical tensions produced by technoscientific development. Through an analytical and interpretative approach, the paper revisits the historical events that shaped modern bioethics and the contemporary challenges that arise from the expansion of biomedical and technological interventions. The analysis highlights persistent dilemmas involving autonomy, paternalism, vulnerability, and intercultural asymmetries, as well as the ethical impact of technoscience on the reconfiguration of life, death, and human nature. The article argues for a pluralistic and adaptive bioethics capable of sustaining epistemic vigilance and guiding decision-making processes in diverse and complex sociocultural contexts.

CultureVol. 2(2)
University of the Coast (CO)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.