Hidden Dimensions in Clinical Ethics Consultation

Clinical Ethics Consultation addresses ethical questions, conflicts, and dilemmas in healthcare. This article argues that there are ethical dimensions in Clinical Ethics Consultation that are difficult to identify and need to be addressed additionally in Clinical Ethics Consultation models. Despite the diverse models and instruments developed across different regions, existing approaches often do not explicitly address these dimensions. The article illustrates the following critical hidden dimensions: issues of power and knowledge, pointing to structural and epistemic injustices, as well as further epistemic issues of implicit biases and subjectivity, intersectional discrimination, and limited participation of patients and their relatives. We argue that improving practice requires greater awareness of these hidden dimensions, consultant self-reflexivity, epistemic humility, and the implementation of specific strategies to mitigate power imbalances, thereby better fulfilling the goal of Clinical Ethics Consultation to support nuanced ethical decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-025-10542-4
Primary Topic
Ethics in medical practice
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hidden Dimensions in Clinical Ethics Consultation

Helen Kohlen, R Ouven Porz, Anna-Henrikje Seidlein, Marie-Christine Fritzsche
Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
Ethics in medical practice
article

Hidden Dimensions in Clinical Ethics Consultation

Helen Kohlen, R Ouven Porz, Anna-Henrikje Seidlein, Marie-Christine Fritzsche
article en

Abstract

Clinical Ethics Consultation addresses ethical questions, conflicts, and dilemmas in healthcare. This article argues that there are ethical dimensions in Clinical Ethics Consultation that are difficult to identify and need to be addressed additionally in Clinical Ethics Consultation models. Despite the diverse models and instruments developed across different regions, existing approaches often do not explicitly address these dimensions. The article illustrates the following critical hidden dimensions: issues of power and knowledge, pointing to structural and epistemic injustices, as well as further epistemic issues of implicit biases and subjectivity, intersectional discrimination, and limited participation of patients and their relatives. We argue that improving practice requires greater awareness of these hidden dimensions, consultant self-reflexivity, epistemic humility, and the implementation of specific strategies to mitigate power imbalances, thereby better fulfilling the goal of Clinical Ethics Consultation to support nuanced ethical decision-making.

Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
Universitätsmedizin Greifswald (DE), University Hospital of Bern (CH), Universität Greifswald (DE), Universitätsklinikum Aachen (DE), Technical University of Munich (DE), RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions, Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ethics in medical practice
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.