Freeze it or leave it? Evaluating the role of cryo-electron microscopy in battery research

Abstract Cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) continues to gain prominence in materials science, particularly in battery research where it has enabled high-resolution, multimodal characterization of electrode materials and interfaces that otherwise degrade quickly under electron beam irradiation. But as anyone who has attempted cryo-EM techniques knows, freezing comes at a cost; cryo-EM experiments are time-consuming, highly sensitive, and carry an increased risk of artifacts due to issues such as frost contamination. Thus, when planning new characterization of battery materials or other beam-sensitive samples, it is critical to consider whether (and which) cryo-EM techniques are appropriate, based on study goals and an understanding of electron beam-sample interactions. Here we review such considerations for battery materials to elucidate the questions of when, why, and how to freeze to achieve high-quality characterization. Graphical abstract

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
MRS Communications
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1557/s43579-026-00971-6
Primary Topic
Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Freeze it or leave it? Evaluating the role of cryo-electron microscopy in battery research

Hyeongjun Koh, Nikita S. Dutta
MRS Communications
Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
article

Freeze it or leave it? Evaluating the role of cryo-electron microscopy in battery research

Hyeongjun Koh, Nikita S. Dutta
article en

Abstract

Abstract Cryogenic electron microscopy (cryo-EM) continues to gain prominence in materials science, particularly in battery research where it has enabled high-resolution, multimodal characterization of electrode materials and interfaces that otherwise degrade quickly under electron beam irradiation. But as anyone who has attempted cryo-EM techniques knows, freezing comes at a cost; cryo-EM experiments are time-consuming, highly sensitive, and carry an increased risk of artifacts due to issues such as frost contamination. Thus, when planning new characterization of battery materials or other beam-sensitive samples, it is critical to consider whether (and which) cryo-EM techniques are appropriate, based on study goals and an understanding of electron beam-sample interactions. Here we review such considerations for battery materials to elucidate the questions of when, why, and how to freeze to achieve high-quality characterization. Graphical abstract

MRS Communications
National Laboratory of the Rockies (US), Brookhaven National Laboratory (US)
National Science Foundation, U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Division of Materials Research, Vehicle Technologies Office, Brookhaven National Laboratory
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.