LLM-generated formative feedback in education: A qualitative systematic literature review

Formative feedback is a central component of learning and a key feature of digital learning systems. Since late 2022, instruction-tuned large language models (LLMs) have enabled scalable generation of elaborated, formative feedback for text-based student assignments across domains. Existing reviews do not adequately reflect these developments. To address this gap, we conducted a qualitative systematic literature review following PRISMA guidelines, synthesizing evidence from 47 peer-reviewed empirical studies including 121 distinct research questions, published between 2022 and 2026. The review was guided by three research questions examining (1) theoretical framings and dominant research questions, (2) methodological and contextual characteristics, and (3) technological trends and empirical findings related to feedback quality, feedback processing, and learning outcomes. The reviewed literature is primarily grounded in formative feedback theory, self-regulated learning, feedback literacy, and human–AI interaction frameworks. Methodologically, studies are dominated by short-term experiments, quasi-experimental classroom studies, and expert evaluations of feedback quality, mostly situated in higher education. Technologically, most studies employ proprietary, pre-trained GPT-3.5 or GPT-4 models with context-enriched, role-based zero-shot prompting or few-shot prompting, while fine-tuned, open-source, and multi-agent approaches are beginning to emerge. Empirical findings indicate that LLM-generated formative feedback consistently outperforms no-feedback conditions and often improves revision quality, motivation, and short-term learning outcomes, sometimes approaching teacher feedback under well-designed prompting. However, recurring risks include hallucinations, over-positivity, and misclassification of student work. Emerging evidence suggests that instruction fine-tuning, grounding prompts in student artifacts, and teacher-in-the-loop oversight can mitigate these issues.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers and Education Open
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2026.100374
Primary Topic
Student Assessment and Feedback
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

LLM-generated formative feedback in education: A qualitative systematic literature review

Christian Klotz, Moritz Seibold, Uwe Maier
Computers and Education Open
Student Assessment and Feedback
article

LLM-generated formative feedback in education: A qualitative systematic literature review

Christian Klotz, Moritz Seibold, Uwe Maier
article en

Abstract

Formative feedback is a central component of learning and a key feature of digital learning systems. Since late 2022, instruction-tuned large language models (LLMs) have enabled scalable generation of elaborated, formative feedback for text-based student assignments across domains. Existing reviews do not adequately reflect these developments. To address this gap, we conducted a qualitative systematic literature review following PRISMA guidelines, synthesizing evidence from 47 peer-reviewed empirical studies including 121 distinct research questions, published between 2022 and 2026. The review was guided by three research questions examining (1) theoretical framings and dominant research questions, (2) methodological and contextual characteristics, and (3) technological trends and empirical findings related to feedback quality, feedback processing, and learning outcomes. The reviewed literature is primarily grounded in formative feedback theory, self-regulated learning, feedback literacy, and human–AI interaction frameworks. Methodologically, studies are dominated by short-term experiments, quasi-experimental classroom studies, and expert evaluations of feedback quality, mostly situated in higher education. Technologically, most studies employ proprietary, pre-trained GPT-3.5 or GPT-4 models with context-enriched, role-based zero-shot prompting or few-shot prompting, while fine-tuned, open-source, and multi-agent approaches are beginning to emerge. Empirical findings indicate that LLM-generated formative feedback consistently outperforms no-feedback conditions and often improves revision quality, motivation, and short-term learning outcomes, sometimes approaching teacher feedback under well-designed prompting. However, recurring risks include hallucinations, over-positivity, and misclassification of student work. Emerging evidence suggests that instruction fine-tuning, grounding prompts in student artifacts, and teacher-in-the-loop oversight can mitigate these issues.

Computers and Education Open
University of Design Schwäbisch Gmünd (DE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Student Assessment and Feedback
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

LLM-generated formative feedback in education: A qualitative systematic literature review — Christian Klotz, Moritz Seibold, et al. · Computers and Education Open (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS