Be/Coming a Teacher Stranger in the Gaze of AI: An Autobiographical Inquiry

The rapid emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) has profoundly reshaped writing, teaching, and scholarly life in higher education. While some existing literature focuses on ethical guidelines, AI literacy, and instructional integration, inadequate attention has been paid to the lived, existential experience of university educators encountering AI. This article offers an autobiographical inquiry into what it means to teach, write, and remain human in the gaze of artificial intelligence. Drawing on curriculum theory, existential philosophy, and narrative inquiry, the article traces the author’s long relationship with writing and teaching—from slow, embodied wrestling with words in adolescence and graduate study to the unsettling ease introduced by AI tools. While AI promises efficiency, convenience, and productivity, this ease is accompanied by a growing sense of boredom, dispossession, and ethical unease. Writing and teaching risk being reduced to accelerated outputs, while the joys of uncertainty, struggle, and reflective presence—central to human learning—are quietly eroded. Engaging Maxine Greene’s concept of the <i>teacher as stranger</i>, William Pinar’s notion of <i>non-coincidence</i> and subjective presence, and critiques of techno-corporate culture in higher education, the article argues for a praxis of refusal and witnessing. Refusal here does not signify technophobia, but a deliberate ethical stance that resists allowing machines to think, decide, and write on behalf of educators. Witnessing, instead, becomes a reflective praxis—an ongoing attentiveness to what AI does to teachers’ identities, relationships, and inner lives. Ultimately, the article proposes be/coming a teacher stranger alongside AI: remaining wide-awake, critically attuned, and existentially present in teaching and writing. In an age that privileges speed, automation, and standardization, preserving slowness, vulnerability, and autobiographical presence emerges as an ethical and pedagogical act—one essential to sustaining shared humanity in higher education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education Journal
Published
2026-04-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11648/j.edu.20261502.15
Primary Topic
Digital Education and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Be/Coming a Teacher Stranger in the Gaze of AI: An Autobiographical Inquiry

Ying Ma
Education Journal
Digital Education and Society
article

Be/Coming a Teacher Stranger in the Gaze of AI: An Autobiographical Inquiry

Ying Ma
article en

Abstract

The rapid emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) has profoundly reshaped writing, teaching, and scholarly life in higher education. While some existing literature focuses on ethical guidelines, AI literacy, and instructional integration, inadequate attention has been paid to the lived, existential experience of university educators encountering AI. This article offers an autobiographical inquiry into what it means to teach, write, and remain human in the gaze of artificial intelligence. Drawing on curriculum theory, existential philosophy, and narrative inquiry, the article traces the author’s long relationship with writing and teaching—from slow, embodied wrestling with words in adolescence and graduate study to the unsettling ease introduced by AI tools. While AI promises efficiency, convenience, and productivity, this ease is accompanied by a growing sense of boredom, dispossession, and ethical unease. Writing and teaching risk being reduced to accelerated outputs, while the joys of uncertainty, struggle, and reflective presence—central to human learning—are quietly eroded. Engaging Maxine Greene’s concept of the <i>teacher as stranger</i>, William Pinar’s notion of <i>non-coincidence</i> and subjective presence, and critiques of techno-corporate culture in higher education, the article argues for a praxis of refusal and witnessing. Refusal here does not signify technophobia, but a deliberate ethical stance that resists allowing machines to think, decide, and write on behalf of educators. Witnessing, instead, becomes a reflective praxis—an ongoing attentiveness to what AI does to teachers’ identities, relationships, and inner lives. Ultimately, the article proposes be/coming a teacher stranger alongside AI: remaining wide-awake, critically attuned, and existentially present in teaching and writing. In an age that privileges speed, automation, and standardization, preserving slowness, vulnerability, and autobiographical presence emerges as an ethical and pedagogical act—one essential to sustaining shared humanity in higher education.

Education JournalVol. 15(2)
Kwantlen Polytechnic University (CA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Digital Education and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.