Providing an Optimized and emPowered Pregnancy for You (P<sup>3</sup>OPPY) Acceptability and Feasibility Pilot Trial.

BACKGROUND: Persistent racial inequities in maternal morbidity and mortality disproportionately affect non-Hispanic Black pregnant women in the United States, particularly those living in socioeconomically deprived communities. Community health worker (CHW) programs and digital health interventions (DHI) show promise for improving perinatal outcomes, yet few randomized trials have evaluated their acceptability or feasibility in high-risk perinatal populations. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) to determine the feasibility of randomizing participants in a perinatal intervention trial and ascertain whether participants found the interventions acceptable. STUDY DESIGN: Single-center, parallel RCT including non-Hispanic Black participants, between 16-49 years, 8⁰-22⁶ weeks gestational age (GA), and residing in resource-poor communities in XXX, defined as Area Deprivation Index (ADI) 60-100. Using a 2-by-2 factorial design, participants were randomly assigned to DHI vs usual care and to CHW vs usual care; providers were blinded. The primary outcome for this pilot was acceptability of the intervention. Secondary outcomes included recruitment feasibility, participant's intervention satisfaction (1-10 scale, 10 highest satisfaction), number of prenatal care (PNC) visits, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Forty participants were successfully recruited and randomized from July-October 2023. Median age, GA at enrollment, and ADI were 29 years, 14 weeks, and 90; 78% were parous, 18% were married, 60% had ≤ a high school diploma, and 80% were publicly insured. Of those randomized to CHW, 18/21 recommended CHW care; of those randomized to DHI, 18/20 recommended DHI care. Participants randomized to CHW were highly satisfied (100% responded 10/10; n=18); DHI participants were also highly satisfied (median satisfaction score 8/10, IQR 7-10, n=18). Participants attended a median 11 PNC visits and delivered at a median GA of 37 weeks; 5 (13%) experienced pregnancy loss and 25% of neonates were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit. CONCLUSION: Participants were successfully recruited and randomized in a perinatal intervention trial and reported high rates of satisfaction with DHI and CHW interventions, lending support for a large RCT powered for key clinical outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2026-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2026.101986
Primary Topic
Global Maternal and Child Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Providing an Optimized and emPowered Pregnancy for You (P3OPPY) Acceptability and Feasibility Pilot Trial.

Angelina A. Toluhi, Colm P. Travers, Molly Richardson, Henna Budhwani, PhD, MPH et al.
PubMed
Global Maternal and Child Health
article

Providing an Optimized and emPowered Pregnancy for You (P3OPPY) Acceptability and Feasibility Pilot Trial.

Angelina A. Toluhi, Colm P. Travers, Molly Richardson, Henna Budhwani, PhD, MPH, Vivek V. Shukla, Janet M. Turan, Martha Slay Wingate, Donna Dunn, Justin M. Leach, Rosylen Quinney, T. P. Ashford, Denita Lindsey, Vamsisaikrishna Morla, Kayla Torres-Benson, Charlotte McCarley, Jeff Szychowski, Rachel Sinkey, Alan T N Tita, Jesse Rattan, Waldemar A Carlo, Alysia Campbell, Brian Casey, Victoria Jauk, Lynetta West
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Persistent racial inequities in maternal morbidity and mortality disproportionately affect non-Hispanic Black pregnant women in the United States, particularly those living in socioeconomically deprived communities. Community health worker (CHW) programs and digital health interventions (DHI) show promise for improving perinatal outcomes, yet few randomized trials have evaluated their acceptability or feasibility in high-risk perinatal populations. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) to determine the feasibility of randomizing participants in a perinatal intervention trial and ascertain whether participants found the interventions acceptable. STUDY DESIGN: Single-center, parallel RCT including non-Hispanic Black participants, between 16-49 years, 8⁰-22⁶ weeks gestational age (GA), and residing in resource-poor communities in XXX, defined as Area Deprivation Index (ADI) 60-100. Using a 2-by-2 factorial design, participants were randomly assigned to DHI vs usual care and to CHW vs usual care; providers were blinded. The primary outcome for this pilot was acceptability of the intervention. Secondary outcomes included recruitment feasibility, participant's intervention satisfaction (1-10 scale, 10 highest satisfaction), number of prenatal care (PNC) visits, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Forty participants were successfully recruited and randomized from July-October 2023. Median age, GA at enrollment, and ADI were 29 years, 14 weeks, and 90; 78% were parous, 18% were married, 60% had ≤ a high school diploma, and 80% were publicly insured. Of those randomized to CHW, 18/21 recommended CHW care; of those randomized to DHI, 18/20 recommended DHI care. Participants randomized to CHW were highly satisfied (100% responded 10/10; n=18); DHI participants were also highly satisfied (median satisfaction score 8/10, IQR 7-10, n=18). Participants attended a median 11 PNC visits and delivered at a median GA of 37 weeks; 5 (13%) experienced pregnancy loss and 25% of neonates were admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit. CONCLUSION: Participants were successfully recruited and randomized in a perinatal intervention trial and reported high rates of satisfaction with DHI and CHW interventions, lending support for a large RCT powered for key clinical outcomes.

PubMed
Institute for Women's Policy Research (US), Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (US), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), Good Samaritan Foundation (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Global Maternal and Child Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.