Preparing Emergency Medicine Residents for the Certifying Exam: A Pilot Study of a Longitudinal Simulation‐Based Assessment Program

Background: The American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) has recently introduced a new Certifying Exam, which incorporates assessment of performance in a simulated clinical environment. Simulation-based assessments allow for reproducible, controlled evaluations. The residency program has a responsibility to prepare residents for the Certifying Exam and to verify resident competency. We sought to determine the feasibility of a simulation-based assessment program encompassing three domains (resuscitation, procedural skills, and communication) with assessments against pre-determined Minimum Competency Scores (MCS) to provide evidence for program director attestations of competence. Methods: Eight stations were chosen based on ABEM's Certifying Exam content, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Milestones, and proposed Entrustable Professional Activities. Simulation-based case scenarios and assessment checklists were created with standard settings performed using the Mastery Angoff process. These stations were categorized into three different domains: resuscitation (Adult Medical, Pediatric Medical, Trauma, and Neonatal), procedural skills (Direct Laryngoscopy, Cricothyrotomy, and Central Venous Catheter Placement), and communication (Breaking Bad News). Results were summarized with descriptive statistics. Results: Thirty emergency medicine residents at an academic Midwestern residency program underwent assessments over one year. None of the residents achieved the MCS on all eight assessments. Residents achieved the MCS on an average of 4.24 stations. There was large performance variability, particularly for the Pediatric Medical (27%-100% items correct), Neonatal Resuscitation (30%-100%), and Breaking Bad News (31%-100%) scenarios. A greater percentage of residents met the MCS for procedural assessments. Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of a simulation-based assessment program designed to provide objective evidence of clinical competency. Assessment outcomes and associated feedback can be used by learners to guide the development of educational plans for performance improvement. Educators can use the resulting data to assess readiness for independent practice, prepare for the Certifying Exam, and identify content areas that may require additional program-wide education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AEM Education and Training
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/aet2.70172
Primary Topic
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preparing Emergency Medicine Residents for the Certifying Exam: A Pilot Study of a Longitudinal Simulation‐Based Assessment Program

Jennifer Mitzman, Jennifer Yee, Colin G. Kaide, Andrew P. Kendle et al.
AEM Education and Training
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
article

Preparing Emergency Medicine Residents for the Certifying Exam: A Pilot Study of a Longitudinal Simulation‐Based Assessment Program

Jennifer Mitzman, Jennifer Yee, Colin G. Kaide, Andrew P. Kendle, Simiao Li‐Sauerwine, Krystin N. Miller, Ashish R. Panchal, Sorabh Khandelwal, Kelsey H. Jordan, Geremiha Emerson, Cynthia Leung, Christopher E. San Miguel, Benjamin M. Ostro, Sally A. Santen
article en

Abstract

Background: The American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM) has recently introduced a new Certifying Exam, which incorporates assessment of performance in a simulated clinical environment. Simulation-based assessments allow for reproducible, controlled evaluations. The residency program has a responsibility to prepare residents for the Certifying Exam and to verify resident competency. We sought to determine the feasibility of a simulation-based assessment program encompassing three domains (resuscitation, procedural skills, and communication) with assessments against pre-determined Minimum Competency Scores (MCS) to provide evidence for program director attestations of competence. Methods: Eight stations were chosen based on ABEM's Certifying Exam content, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Milestones, and proposed Entrustable Professional Activities. Simulation-based case scenarios and assessment checklists were created with standard settings performed using the Mastery Angoff process. These stations were categorized into three different domains: resuscitation (Adult Medical, Pediatric Medical, Trauma, and Neonatal), procedural skills (Direct Laryngoscopy, Cricothyrotomy, and Central Venous Catheter Placement), and communication (Breaking Bad News). Results were summarized with descriptive statistics. Results: Thirty emergency medicine residents at an academic Midwestern residency program underwent assessments over one year. None of the residents achieved the MCS on all eight assessments. Residents achieved the MCS on an average of 4.24 stations. There was large performance variability, particularly for the Pediatric Medical (27%-100% items correct), Neonatal Resuscitation (30%-100%), and Breaking Bad News (31%-100%) scenarios. A greater percentage of residents met the MCS for procedural assessments. Conclusions: This pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of a simulation-based assessment program designed to provide objective evidence of clinical competency. Assessment outcomes and associated feedback can be used by learners to guide the development of educational plans for performance improvement. Educators can use the resulting data to assess readiness for independent practice, prepare for the Certifying Exam, and identify content areas that may require additional program-wide education.

AEM Education and TrainingVol. 10(3)
University of California, San Francisco (US), The Ohio State University (US), University of Cincinnati Medical Center (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.