Positive Bias in Value-Based Decision Making: Neurocognitive Associations With Resilience

Adaptive behavior in everyday life regularly relies on value-based decision making. In this study, positive choice biases in decisions requiring a cost-benefit integration were associated with higher trait acceptance, a facet of self-reported resilience. Notably, this link was statistically accounted for by differences in neural processing. People with a more positive choice bias showed stronger neural responses to negative information in brain regions involved in cognitive control. This may reflect greater regulation of the processing of negative information and aligns with cognitive modeling pointing to a lower valuation of negative relative to positive information. These differences in value processing could shape experiences and behavior in ways that make some individuals more resilient to stress and mental health problems than others.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.1734-25.2026
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Positive Bias in Value-Based Decision Making: Neurocognitive Associations With Resilience

Andrew Heathcote, Rebecca A. Rammensee, Ulrike Basten
Journal of Neuroscience
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
article

Positive Bias in Value-Based Decision Making: Neurocognitive Associations With Resilience

Andrew Heathcote, Rebecca A. Rammensee, Ulrike Basten
article en

Abstract

Adaptive behavior in everyday life regularly relies on value-based decision making. In this study, positive choice biases in decisions requiring a cost-benefit integration were associated with higher trait acceptance, a facet of self-reported resilience. Notably, this link was statistically accounted for by differences in neural processing. People with a more positive choice bias showed stronger neural responses to negative information in brain regions involved in cognitive control. This may reflect greater regulation of the processing of negative information and aligns with cognitive modeling pointing to a lower valuation of negative relative to positive information. These differences in value processing could shape experiences and behavior in ways that make some individuals more resilient to stress and mental health problems than others.

Journal of Neuroscience
University of Koblenz and Landau (DE), Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Positive Bias in Value-Based Decision Making: Neurocognitive Associations With Resilience — Andrew Heathcote, Rebecca A. Rammensee, et al. · Journal of Neuroscience (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS