Students’ Use of Generative AI Tools in Multiple Choice Exams

The integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools into higher education presents both opportunities and challenges, particularly in assessment contexts. This study investigates the impact of GenAI usage on student performance in a graduate-level time series analysis course, focusing on multiple choice exams. Through a controlled experiment involving two student cohorts, each having access to GenAI tools during one of two midterms, we analyze performance outcomes and engagement behaviors using multimodal screen recordings. Statistical analyses reveal that GenAI access correlates with improved scores but only when students are adequately prepared to use the tools effectively. Frequent or prolonged GenAI usage alone did not predict better outcomes, highlighting the importance of AI literacy. Additionally, traditional course materials remained strong predictors of performance across both cohorts. These findings suggest that GenAI can enhance learning when integrated thoughtfully and accompanied by instructional support. The study contributes to the evolving discourse on AI in education by offering empirical insights into its role in assessments and proposing implications for instructional design and policy. Funding: This research has been supported by the Master of Science in Analytics degree at Georgia Tech but we don’t have a specific funding other than this internal support. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/ited.2025.0166 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
INFORMS Transactions on Education
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1287/ited.2025.0166
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Students’ Use of Generative AI Tools in Multiple Choice Exams

Nicoleta Serban, Joel Sokol, Tuba Ketenci
INFORMS Transactions on Education
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Students’ Use of Generative AI Tools in Multiple Choice Exams

Nicoleta Serban, Joel Sokol, Tuba Ketenci
article en

Abstract

The integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) tools into higher education presents both opportunities and challenges, particularly in assessment contexts. This study investigates the impact of GenAI usage on student performance in a graduate-level time series analysis course, focusing on multiple choice exams. Through a controlled experiment involving two student cohorts, each having access to GenAI tools during one of two midterms, we analyze performance outcomes and engagement behaviors using multimodal screen recordings. Statistical analyses reveal that GenAI access correlates with improved scores but only when students are adequately prepared to use the tools effectively. Frequent or prolonged GenAI usage alone did not predict better outcomes, highlighting the importance of AI literacy. Additionally, traditional course materials remained strong predictors of performance across both cohorts. These findings suggest that GenAI can enhance learning when integrated thoughtfully and accompanied by instructional support. The study contributes to the evolving discourse on AI in education by offering empirical insights into its role in assessments and proposing implications for instructional design and policy. Funding: This research has been supported by the Master of Science in Analytics degree at Georgia Tech but we don’t have a specific funding other than this internal support. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/ited.2025.0166 .

INFORMS Transactions on Education
Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.