The speech and language therapist’s role in supporting decision-making for people with aphasia: an international cross-sectional survey

PURPOSE: This is the first study to describe how speech and language therapists (SLTs) support people with aphasia during decision-making conversations and mental capacity assessments across countries. METHODS: Convergent mixed methods design involving a descriptive, cross-sectional online survey. The survey was disseminated via social media and professional networks across the six World Health Organisation Regions. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-five SLTs from 32 countries responded. Most respondents, especially those working in inpatient settings, had supported people with aphasia to make decisions as part of a general conversation or had enabled other professionals to provide decision-making support, including during capacity assessments. Fewer had been involved directly in capacity assessments. To do this work, respondents made use of different resources and methods to facilitate communication about decisions and information and practical support from family members and other professionals. Respondents identified a range of barriers and facilitators to practice, relating to multidisciplinary collaboration, the scope of practice for the SLT role, and access to sufficient time, education and guidance. CONCLUSIONS: Across countries, decision-making support for people with aphasia varies. Future research should explore clinical pathways and multidisciplinary training that might facilitate decision-making support for this group. Implications for rehabilitationThis study is the first to investigate how speech and language therapists (SLTs) around the world support people with aphasia to make decisions and take part in mental capacity assessments.There are barriers to SLTs being able to provide this support, for example, other disciplines not seeking their involvement in decision-making processes.When people with aphasia do not receive communication support to engage in decision-making, rehabilitation and care processes are less likely to be patient-centred.Providing education to the multidisciplinary team about communication disability, decision-making and the SLT role and improved collaborative working processes may enable more people with aphasia to receive support.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Disability and Rehabilitation
Published
2026-05-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2026.2662096
Primary Topic
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The speech and language therapist’s role in supporting decision-making for people with aphasia: an international cross-sectional survey

Elyse Shumway, Elissa Larkin, Winsy Wong, Nomiki Karpathiou et al.
Disability and Rehabilitation
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
article

The speech and language therapist’s role in supporting decision-making for people with aphasia: an international cross-sectional survey

Elyse Shumway, Elissa Larkin, Winsy Wong, Nomiki Karpathiou, Anna Volkmer, Mark Jayes, Anthony Pak-Hin Kong, Virginia Brinkley, Maria Assunção Matos, Annette Rotherham, Jytte Kjærgaard Isaksen, Analisa Marie Pais, Alexandra Stipinovich
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: This is the first study to describe how speech and language therapists (SLTs) support people with aphasia during decision-making conversations and mental capacity assessments across countries. METHODS: Convergent mixed methods design involving a descriptive, cross-sectional online survey. The survey was disseminated via social media and professional networks across the six World Health Organisation Regions. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-five SLTs from 32 countries responded. Most respondents, especially those working in inpatient settings, had supported people with aphasia to make decisions as part of a general conversation or had enabled other professionals to provide decision-making support, including during capacity assessments. Fewer had been involved directly in capacity assessments. To do this work, respondents made use of different resources and methods to facilitate communication about decisions and information and practical support from family members and other professionals. Respondents identified a range of barriers and facilitators to practice, relating to multidisciplinary collaboration, the scope of practice for the SLT role, and access to sufficient time, education and guidance. CONCLUSIONS: Across countries, decision-making support for people with aphasia varies. Future research should explore clinical pathways and multidisciplinary training that might facilitate decision-making support for this group. Implications for rehabilitationThis study is the first to investigate how speech and language therapists (SLTs) around the world support people with aphasia to make decisions and take part in mental capacity assessments.There are barriers to SLTs being able to provide this support, for example, other disciplines not seeking their involvement in decision-making processes.When people with aphasia do not receive communication support to engage in decision-making, rehabilitation and care processes are less likely to be patient-centred.Providing education to the multidisciplinary team about communication disability, decision-making and the SLT role and improved collaborative working processes may enable more people with aphasia to receive support.

Disability and Rehabilitation
University of Essex (GB), Manchester Metropolitan University (GB), Alzheimer's Association (US), Shirley Ryan AbilityLab (US), Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK), University of Peloponnese (GR), University of Southern Denmark (DK), Rigshospitalet (DK), Education University of Hong Kong (HK), RR Donnelley (United States) (US), Asia Centre (TH), Norwich Community Hospital (GB), Pro Persona (NL), University College London (GB), University of Aveiro (PT), University of Pretoria (ZA), University of Hong Kong (HK)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.