Mindreading as asynchronous coordination: The MAC account of theory of mind performance, and individual differences

Research on mindreading has been dominated by questions about the presence, absence or nature of mindreading concepts or structures, and by paradigms designed to create the most favourable circumstances for demonstrating such abilities. This focus on competence has led to a neglect of questions about performance. Yet without a theory of performance, mindreading concepts and structures are incapable of explaining how we ascribe particular thoughts and feelings to other people, and it is impossible to explain individual differences in mindreading that are persistent, robust, specific, and consequential for social abilities. We reconsider the theoretical foundations of mindreading to develop an account on which competent mindreading requires generating and selecting mental states that can be recognised as plausible and appropriate by other people, and so is essentially a coordination activity. It is asynchronous coordination because, once learned, it can be performed alone. The MAC (Mindreading as Asynchronous Coordination) account explains how mindreading serves as a mediator in human social lives, is shaped by social experience, varies according to that experience, and enables social abilities that would not be the same without its mediating role. The MAC account can explain a swath of existing findings about individual differences in mindreading that are otherwise puzzling. It provides a framework for understanding how and why mindreading abilities might vary across the lifespan, and for developing interpretable and psychometrically robust measures to study this variation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cognition
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106569
Primary Topic
Embodied and Extended Cognition
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mindreading as asynchronous coordination: The MAC account of theory of mind performance, and individual differences

Ian A. Apperly, Stephen Butterfill, Rory T.; id_orcid 0000-0002-3710-7878 Devine
Cognition
Embodied and Extended Cognition
article

Mindreading as asynchronous coordination: The MAC account of theory of mind performance, and individual differences

Ian A. Apperly, Stephen Butterfill, Rory T.; id_orcid 0000-0002-3710-7878 Devine
article en

Abstract

Research on mindreading has been dominated by questions about the presence, absence or nature of mindreading concepts or structures, and by paradigms designed to create the most favourable circumstances for demonstrating such abilities. This focus on competence has led to a neglect of questions about performance. Yet without a theory of performance, mindreading concepts and structures are incapable of explaining how we ascribe particular thoughts and feelings to other people, and it is impossible to explain individual differences in mindreading that are persistent, robust, specific, and consequential for social abilities. We reconsider the theoretical foundations of mindreading to develop an account on which competent mindreading requires generating and selecting mental states that can be recognised as plausible and appropriate by other people, and so is essentially a coordination activity. It is asynchronous coordination because, once learned, it can be performed alone. The MAC (Mindreading as Asynchronous Coordination) account explains how mindreading serves as a mediator in human social lives, is shaped by social experience, varies according to that experience, and enables social abilities that would not be the same without its mediating role. The MAC account can explain a swath of existing findings about individual differences in mindreading that are otherwise puzzling. It provides a framework for understanding how and why mindreading abilities might vary across the lifespan, and for developing interpretable and psychometrically robust measures to study this variation.

CognitionVol. 274
University of Warwick (GB), University of Birmingham (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Embodied and Extended Cognition
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.