Notorious Footnotes: A Reply to Jonathan Hearn

This article responds to criticisms levelled by Professor Jonathan Hearn at the University of Edinburgh's ‘Race Review’ in this issue. It reflects on historical method, the selection of evidence in service of larger arguments, and scholarly propriety.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scottish Affairs
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3366/scot.2026.0589
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Scottish History and National Identity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
79.65
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Notorious Footnotes: A Reply to Jonathan Hearn

Ian Stewart
1 citations
Scottish Affairs
Scottish History and National Identity
79.65
article

Notorious Footnotes: A Reply to Jonathan Hearn

Ian Stewart
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article responds to criticisms levelled by Professor Jonathan Hearn at the University of Edinburgh's ‘Race Review’ in this issue. It reflects on historical method, the selection of evidence in service of larger arguments, and scholarly propriety.

Scottish AffairsVol. 35(2)
École des hautes études en sciences sociales (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Scottish History and National Identity
79.65
DOISourceOpenAlex
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.