Development and Validation of the Primary Care Needs Assessment (PCNA) Questionnaire: A Participatory Multidimensional Approach to Identifying Health Needs

Background/Objectives: Assessing population healthcare needs is essential for effective primary health care (PHC) planning; however, existing approaches often rely on biomedical or service-centered frameworks (i.e., approaches focusing on utilization patterns, clinical indicators, and provider performance metrics) that may not adequately capture the multidimensional and context-dependent nature of health needs. This study aimed to develop and validate the Primary Care Needs Assessment (PCNA) questionnaire, a participatory, multidimensional, and context-sensitive instrument for assessing perceived unmet healthcare needs and contextual determinants of health in community-based PHC settings. Methods: A sequential mixed-methods design was employed. In the qualitative phase, focus groups with PHC professionals and semi-structured interviews with community members informed item generation. The resulting questionnaire was administered to a sample of 817 participants recruited from community and primary care settings. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted on a subsample (n = 520), followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on an independent subsample (n = 297). Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha. Results: EFA identified a 10-factor structure explaining 55.05% of the variance. CFA supported a refined 9-factor model with good fit indices (χ2/df = 1.675, RMSEA = 0.048, CFI = 0.92, TLI = 0.90, SRMR = 0.06). The instrument demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency (α = 0.76). Findings also highlighted unmet needs related to mental health, access to specialized services, and structural barriers (e.g., geographic distance, financial cost, limited service availability, and organizational constraints in accessing care), underscoring the multidimensional nature of health needs. Conclusions: The PCNA is a valid and reliable instrument that captures the complex interplay of individual, social, and contextual factors shaping health needs in PHC. By integrating community perspectives with psychometric validation, it provides a practical tool for supporting evidence-informed planning and more responsive, person-centered PHC systems (i.e., systems that adapt service provision to community-identified priorities and evolving population needs).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Healthcare
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14101302
Primary Topic
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and Validation of the Primary Care Needs Assessment (PCNA) Questionnaire: A Participatory Multidimensional Approach to Identifying Health Needs

Stella Ploukou, Andreas Tsounis, Anastasia Zissi, Εmmanouil Smyrnakis et al.
Healthcare
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
article

Development and Validation of the Primary Care Needs Assessment (PCNA) Questionnaire: A Participatory Multidimensional Approach to Identifying Health Needs

Stella Ploukou, Andreas Tsounis, Anastasia Zissi, Εmmanouil Smyrnakis, Alexis Benos, Pavlos Sarafis, Evangelos Kyritsakas, Eleni Papakosta-Gaki
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Assessing population healthcare needs is essential for effective primary health care (PHC) planning; however, existing approaches often rely on biomedical or service-centered frameworks (i.e., approaches focusing on utilization patterns, clinical indicators, and provider performance metrics) that may not adequately capture the multidimensional and context-dependent nature of health needs. This study aimed to develop and validate the Primary Care Needs Assessment (PCNA) questionnaire, a participatory, multidimensional, and context-sensitive instrument for assessing perceived unmet healthcare needs and contextual determinants of health in community-based PHC settings. Methods: A sequential mixed-methods design was employed. In the qualitative phase, focus groups with PHC professionals and semi-structured interviews with community members informed item generation. The resulting questionnaire was administered to a sample of 817 participants recruited from community and primary care settings. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was conducted on a subsample (n = 520), followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) on an independent subsample (n = 297). Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha. Results: EFA identified a 10-factor structure explaining 55.05% of the variance. CFA supported a refined 9-factor model with good fit indices (χ2/df = 1.675, RMSEA = 0.048, CFI = 0.92, TLI = 0.90, SRMR = 0.06). The instrument demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency (α = 0.76). Findings also highlighted unmet needs related to mental health, access to specialized services, and structural barriers (e.g., geographic distance, financial cost, limited service availability, and organizational constraints in accessing care), underscoring the multidimensional nature of health needs. Conclusions: The PCNA is a valid and reliable instrument that captures the complex interplay of individual, social, and contextual factors shaping health needs in PHC. By integrating community perspectives with psychometric validation, it provides a practical tool for supporting evidence-informed planning and more responsive, person-centered PHC systems (i.e., systems that adapt service provision to community-identified priorities and evolving population needs).

HealthcareVol. 14(10)
University of Thessaly (GR), National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR), Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR), National Public Health Organization (GR), University of the Aegean (GR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Primary Care and Health Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.