A Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Three Partial Range of Field Intraocular Lenses Using a Mini-monovision Strategy

Purpose: To evaluate the visual and refractive outcomes of three different partial range of field intraocular lenses (PRoF IOLs) using a mini-monvision strategy. Methods: This was a single-center, prospective, randomized double-blind study enrolling 105 patients who underwent bilateral cataract surgery with implantation of either Isopure (BVI Medical, n = 36), Tecnis Eyhance (Johnson & Johnson, n = 35), or AcrySof IQ Vivity (Alcon Laboratories, Inc, n = 34) IOLs. Binocular and monocular (dominant eye) visual acuity at distance, intermediate, and near ranges, defocus curves, and spectacle independence (PRSIQ) were assessed over a 6-month follow-up. Mini-monovision (−0.50 diopters [D] in the non-dominant eye) was employed. Results: At 6 months, binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity was excellent (Isopure: −0.06 ± 0.09; Vivity: −0.01 ± 0.09; Eyhance: −0.05 ± 0.07 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]; P = .077). Binocular uncorrected intermediate visual acuity was similar across the three groups (Isopure: 0.07 ± 0.10; Vivity: 0.05 ± 0.08; Eyhance: 0.06 ± 0.11 logMAR; P = .592). Vivity showed better binocular uncorrected near visual acuity than Isopure and Eyhance (Isopure: 0.29 ± 0.13; Vivity: 0.19 ± 0.12; Eyhance: 0.30 ± 0.15 logMAR; P ≤ .012). Monocular uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity were significantly worse in the Vivity group ( P < .001 vs Vivity). All IOLs maintained binocular visual acuity ≤0.20 logMAR from +1.00 to −1.50 diopters (D), with Vivity showing superior performance at −1.50 and −2.00 D. Spectacle independence was high for distance (≥85%) and intermediate (≥92%) tasks in all groups. Most patients required near correction at least occasionally. Conclusions: All three PRoF IOLs provided excellent distance and intermediate vision with functional near vision using a mini-monvision strategy. Vivity offered slightly better near acuity and defocus performance, whereas Isopure and Eyhance tended to show superior distance vision.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Refractive Surgery
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597x-20260216-02
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Three Partial Range of Field Intraocular Lenses Using a Mini-monovision Strategy

Mark Rabinovich, Kristof Vandekerckhove, David P. Piñero
Journal of Refractive Surgery
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

A Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Three Partial Range of Field Intraocular Lenses Using a Mini-monovision Strategy

Mark Rabinovich, Kristof Vandekerckhove, David P. Piñero
article en

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the visual and refractive outcomes of three different partial range of field intraocular lenses (PRoF IOLs) using a mini-monvision strategy. Methods: This was a single-center, prospective, randomized double-blind study enrolling 105 patients who underwent bilateral cataract surgery with implantation of either Isopure (BVI Medical, n = 36), Tecnis Eyhance (Johnson & Johnson, n = 35), or AcrySof IQ Vivity (Alcon Laboratories, Inc, n = 34) IOLs. Binocular and monocular (dominant eye) visual acuity at distance, intermediate, and near ranges, defocus curves, and spectacle independence (PRSIQ) were assessed over a 6-month follow-up. Mini-monovision (−0.50 diopters [D] in the non-dominant eye) was employed. Results: At 6 months, binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity was excellent (Isopure: −0.06 ± 0.09; Vivity: −0.01 ± 0.09; Eyhance: −0.05 ± 0.07 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR]; P = .077). Binocular uncorrected intermediate visual acuity was similar across the three groups (Isopure: 0.07 ± 0.10; Vivity: 0.05 ± 0.08; Eyhance: 0.06 ± 0.11 logMAR; P = .592). Vivity showed better binocular uncorrected near visual acuity than Isopure and Eyhance (Isopure: 0.29 ± 0.13; Vivity: 0.19 ± 0.12; Eyhance: 0.30 ± 0.15 logMAR; P ≤ .012). Monocular uncorrected and corrected distance visual acuity were significantly worse in the Vivity group ( P < .001 vs Vivity). All IOLs maintained binocular visual acuity ≤0.20 logMAR from +1.00 to −1.50 diopters (D), with Vivity showing superior performance at −1.50 and −2.00 D. Spectacle independence was high for distance (≥85%) and intermediate (≥92%) tasks in all groups. Most patients required near correction at least occasionally. Conclusions: All three PRoF IOLs provided excellent distance and intermediate vision with functional near vision using a mini-monvision strategy. Vivity offered slightly better near acuity and defocus performance, whereas Isopure and Eyhance tended to show superior distance vision.

Journal of Refractive SurgeryVol. 42(5)
University of Alicante (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Prospective, Randomized Comparison of Three Partial Range of Field Intraocular Lenses Using a Mini-monovision Strategy — Mark Rabinovich, Kristof Vandekerckhove, et al. · Journal of Refractive Surgery (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS