Constructing a remedy for data hoards

This article considers how a constructive data trust—a court order that someone holds property for the benefit of another—might offer a reparative solution in privacy and data governance cases. This proposal is situated within an algorithmic reparative framework, which seeks not only to compensate for individual privacy harms but to redress the structural inequities and ill-gotten gains inherent in massive data collection. While scholars have increasingly advocated for data trusts as voluntary governance models to manage information flow, this article distinguishes its contribution by proposing the constructive data trust as an equitable remedy rather than a mere administrative structure. By repurposing this traditional legal instrument, we can transition from a defensive posture of data protection toward a proactive model of data reparation that restores the benefits of data hoards to the communities from which they were extracted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Big Data & Society
Published
2026-05-10
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517261447848
Primary Topic
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Constructing a remedy for data hoards

Jasmine McNealy
Big Data & Society
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
article

Constructing a remedy for data hoards

Jasmine McNealy
article en

Abstract

This article considers how a constructive data trust—a court order that someone holds property for the benefit of another—might offer a reparative solution in privacy and data governance cases. This proposal is situated within an algorithmic reparative framework, which seeks not only to compensate for individual privacy harms but to redress the structural inequities and ill-gotten gains inherent in massive data collection. While scholars have increasingly advocated for data trusts as voluntary governance models to manage information flow, this article distinguishes its contribution by proposing the constructive data trust as an equitable remedy rather than a mere administrative structure. By repurposing this traditional legal instrument, we can transition from a defensive posture of data protection toward a proactive model of data reparation that restores the benefits of data hoards to the communities from which they were extracted.

Big Data & SocietyVol. 13(2)
University of Florida (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.