Impact of Postoperative Corneal Flattening on Visual and Refractive Outcomes in Myopic Photorefractive Keratectomy in the Early Postoperative Period

Purpose: To compare the early postoperative visual and refractive outcomes of patients who underwent myopic photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) with a postoperative mean corneal keratometry <34.00 diopters (D) versus those with a mean corneal keratometry of ⩾34.00 D. Methods: This retrospective study included 17,019 eyes that underwent myopic PRK at Care-Vision Laser Centers with 183 eyes (1.08%) classified as having a flat postoperative cornea (mean keratometry <34.00 D as defined a priori). Baseline and intraoperative characteristics were compared between the flat cornea group and a control group (mean keratometry ≥34.00 D). Postoperative outcomes, including uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), spherical equivalent (SEQ), and other visual and refractive parameters, were analyzed at a mean follow-up of 147 ± 63 days (range: 3 to 12 months, similar for both groups). In a propensity-score–matched cohort (1:3) balanced on baseline and intraoperative variables (age, sex, preoperative mean keratometry, preoperative SEQ, minimum corneal thickness, and intraoperative parameters including treated spherical correction, optical zone, maximum ablation depth, and year of surgery), visual and refractive outcomes were compared between the flat cornea and control groups. Results: Patients in the flat cornea group were more likely to be male (83.1% vs 54.8%, P < .001), had greater preoperative myopia (SEQ: −10.20 ± 2.30 vs −4.90 ± 2.60 D, P < .001), and exhibited thicker minimum corneal thickness (540.7 ± 33.5 vs 530.2 ± 33.6 μm, P < .001). Intraoperatively, they received greater ablations, including a higher spherical correction (8.90 ± 1.50 vs 4.80 ± 2.20 D, P < .001) and deeper maximum ablation depth (131.7 ± 17.2 vs 82.8 ± 36.2 μm, P < .001). In a propensity-score–matched cohort (1:3) balanced on baseline and intraoperative variables, postoperative UDVA, CDVA, and refractive cylinder were similar between groups; safety and efficacy indices were also comparable. Conclusions: Postoperative flat corneas (mean keratometry <34.00 D) achieved comparable visual acuity, safety, and efficacy outcomes following myopic PRK, compared with the control group. Accordingly, the initial concerns regarding worse visual outcomes in flatter corneas may be unfounded.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Refractive Surgery
Published
2026-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597x-20260320-02
Primary Topic
Corneal surgery and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of Postoperative Corneal Flattening on Visual and Refractive Outcomes in Myopic Photorefractive Keratectomy in the Early Postoperative Period

Dror Ben Ephraim Noyman, Tzahi Sela, Waseem Nasser, Gur Munzer et al.
Journal of Refractive Surgery
Corneal surgery and disorders
article

Impact of Postoperative Corneal Flattening on Visual and Refractive Outcomes in Myopic Photorefractive Keratectomy in the Early Postoperative Period

Dror Ben Ephraim Noyman, Tzahi Sela, Waseem Nasser, Gur Munzer, Margarita Safir, David Smadja, Eyal Cohen, Igor Kaiserman, Adir Sommer, Michael Mimouni
article en

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the early postoperative visual and refractive outcomes of patients who underwent myopic photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) with a postoperative mean corneal keratometry <34.00 diopters (D) versus those with a mean corneal keratometry of ⩾34.00 D. Methods: This retrospective study included 17,019 eyes that underwent myopic PRK at Care-Vision Laser Centers with 183 eyes (1.08%) classified as having a flat postoperative cornea (mean keratometry <34.00 D as defined a priori). Baseline and intraoperative characteristics were compared between the flat cornea group and a control group (mean keratometry ≥34.00 D). Postoperative outcomes, including uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), spherical equivalent (SEQ), and other visual and refractive parameters, were analyzed at a mean follow-up of 147 ± 63 days (range: 3 to 12 months, similar for both groups). In a propensity-score–matched cohort (1:3) balanced on baseline and intraoperative variables (age, sex, preoperative mean keratometry, preoperative SEQ, minimum corneal thickness, and intraoperative parameters including treated spherical correction, optical zone, maximum ablation depth, and year of surgery), visual and refractive outcomes were compared between the flat cornea and control groups. Results: Patients in the flat cornea group were more likely to be male (83.1% vs 54.8%, P < .001), had greater preoperative myopia (SEQ: −10.20 ± 2.30 vs −4.90 ± 2.60 D, P < .001), and exhibited thicker minimum corneal thickness (540.7 ± 33.5 vs 530.2 ± 33.6 μm, P < .001). Intraoperatively, they received greater ablations, including a higher spherical correction (8.90 ± 1.50 vs 4.80 ± 2.20 D, P < .001) and deeper maximum ablation depth (131.7 ± 17.2 vs 82.8 ± 36.2 μm, P < .001). In a propensity-score–matched cohort (1:3) balanced on baseline and intraoperative variables, postoperative UDVA, CDVA, and refractive cylinder were similar between groups; safety and efficacy indices were also comparable. Conclusions: Postoperative flat corneas (mean keratometry <34.00 D) achieved comparable visual acuity, safety, and efficacy outcomes following myopic PRK, compared with the control group. Accordingly, the initial concerns regarding worse visual outcomes in flatter corneas may be unfounded.

Journal of Refractive SurgeryVol. 42(5)
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL), Tel Aviv University (IL), Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL), Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL), Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center (IL), Rabin Medical Center (IL), Rambam Health Care Campus (IL), Barzilai Medical Center (IL), Notal Vision (Israel) (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Corneal surgery and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.