From guesswork to guidance: a delphi study on practices of talent identification and development in Para athletics

Objectives To determine best practices in Para athletics talent identification and development through a Delphi survey. Methods A three round Delphi survey was conducted with experts in Para athletics talent identification and development. Round One aimed to elicit insights into the current practices and beliefs in talent identification and development in Para athletics using open ended questions. Round One survey responses were analysed and collated into statements which formulated Round Two, where respondents were asked to rate their level of agreement with these statements. Where consensus was reached (i.e., an agreement level of >75%) no further questions were asked regarding the topic of that statement. Where consensus was not achieved, the statements were revised and carried forward to Round Three. Respondents were required to, again, rate their level of agreement with these statements. Results A total of 23 experts completed three survey rounds (Round One, n = 31; Round Two, n = 24; Round Three n = 23). Thematic analysis of Round One identified themes such as quantitative assessment, coaching approaches, and physical and psychological attributes of athletes. Of 20 statements in Round Two, nine reached consensus. Of 14 statements in Round Three, seven reached consensus. Conclusion Consensus was reached on key talent identification and development strategies including quantitative performance assessments, individualised athlete development plans and high levels of coaching experience and expertise. Together, these approaches contribute to a more structured and evidence-based pathway for athlete progression.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fspor.2026.1791259
Primary Topic
Sport Psychology and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From guesswork to guidance: a delphi study on practices of talent identification and development in Para athletics

Alison O’Riordan, Kate Pumpa, Annmarie Carroll
Frontiers in Sports and Active Living
Sport Psychology and Performance
article

From guesswork to guidance: a delphi study on practices of talent identification and development in Para athletics

Alison O’Riordan, Kate Pumpa, Annmarie Carroll
article en

Abstract

Objectives To determine best practices in Para athletics talent identification and development through a Delphi survey. Methods A three round Delphi survey was conducted with experts in Para athletics talent identification and development. Round One aimed to elicit insights into the current practices and beliefs in talent identification and development in Para athletics using open ended questions. Round One survey responses were analysed and collated into statements which formulated Round Two, where respondents were asked to rate their level of agreement with these statements. Where consensus was reached (i.e., an agreement level of >75%) no further questions were asked regarding the topic of that statement. Where consensus was not achieved, the statements were revised and carried forward to Round Three. Respondents were required to, again, rate their level of agreement with these statements. Results A total of 23 experts completed three survey rounds (Round One, n = 31; Round Two, n = 24; Round Three n = 23). Thematic analysis of Round One identified themes such as quantitative assessment, coaching approaches, and physical and psychological attributes of athletes. Of 20 statements in Round Two, nine reached consensus. Of 14 statements in Round Three, seven reached consensus. Conclusion Consensus was reached on key talent identification and development strategies including quantitative performance assessments, individualised athlete development plans and high levels of coaching experience and expertise. Together, these approaches contribute to a more structured and evidence-based pathway for athlete progression.

Frontiers in Sports and Active LivingVol. 8
University College Dublin (IE), Queen Mary University of London (GB), Sport Ireland (IE)
Sport Ireland Institute
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Sport Psychology and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.