AI-driven data lineage verification using temporal analysis with graph-based anomaly detection: a comparative approach of supervised and unsupervised learning

In data-centric industries, such as finance, healthcare, and cybersecurity, maintaining the integrity and accuracy of data lineage is crucial due to compliance requirements. Current methods for verifying data lineage often struggle with the dynamic and multi-sourced nature of datasets, as well as their scale, resulting in reduced performance in detecting anomalies or validating lineage. In this article, we introduce and provide an empirical assessment of two artificial intelligence-based frameworks for data lineage verification and anomaly detection, which complement each other. In the first phase, we developed an unsupervised approach using Graph Attention Networks (GATs) for structural representation learning and an Isolation Forest for ‘no-label’ anomaly detection. The model surrogate for validation produced over 99.8% accurate reporting on replicated anomaly patterns in unseen test data for Olist, Transaction Processing Council Benchmark H (TPC-H), and Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III). In the second phase, we developed a supervised, multi-modal framework that integrates graph neural networks (GNNs), long short-term memory (LSTM)-Attention networks, Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) for automatic labeling, and Contrastive Learning. To counter the integrated class imbalance of the anomaly detection class, this framework incorporates the Synthetic Minority Over-Sampling Technique (SMOTE) as a fundamental component of its training. Comparing both models on three datasets, the unsupervised model outperforms the supervised model due to its ability to dynamically adapt to data without requiring labels. The supervised model achieves a maximum area under the curve (AUC) of 0.96, and the unsupervised model achieves an AUC of 1.00, indicating better prediction efficiency. The multi-faceted comparison of performance, feature importance, and operational dashboards provides the user with valuable insights, thereby confirming the effectiveness of the first unsupervised model and the second supervised multi-modal model, while fully retaining the explainability, governance, and scalability of data lineage in a comparative pair.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PeerJ Computer Science
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.3608
Primary Topic
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI-driven data lineage verification using temporal analysis with graph-based anomaly detection: a comparative approach of supervised and unsupervised learning

Gang Yuan, Jing Geng, Shengjun Wen
PeerJ Computer Science
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
article

AI-driven data lineage verification using temporal analysis with graph-based anomaly detection: a comparative approach of supervised and unsupervised learning

Gang Yuan, Jing Geng, Shengjun Wen
article en

Abstract

In data-centric industries, such as finance, healthcare, and cybersecurity, maintaining the integrity and accuracy of data lineage is crucial due to compliance requirements. Current methods for verifying data lineage often struggle with the dynamic and multi-sourced nature of datasets, as well as their scale, resulting in reduced performance in detecting anomalies or validating lineage. In this article, we introduce and provide an empirical assessment of two artificial intelligence-based frameworks for data lineage verification and anomaly detection, which complement each other. In the first phase, we developed an unsupervised approach using Graph Attention Networks (GATs) for structural representation learning and an Isolation Forest for ‘no-label’ anomaly detection. The model surrogate for validation produced over 99.8% accurate reporting on replicated anomaly patterns in unseen test data for Olist, Transaction Processing Council Benchmark H (TPC-H), and Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III). In the second phase, we developed a supervised, multi-modal framework that integrates graph neural networks (GNNs), long short-term memory (LSTM)-Attention networks, Dynamic Time Warping (DTW) for automatic labeling, and Contrastive Learning. To counter the integrated class imbalance of the anomaly detection class, this framework incorporates the Synthetic Minority Over-Sampling Technique (SMOTE) as a fundamental component of its training. Comparing both models on three datasets, the unsupervised model outperforms the supervised model due to its ability to dynamically adapt to data without requiring labels. The supervised model achieves a maximum area under the curve (AUC) of 0.96, and the unsupervised model achieves an AUC of 1.00, indicating better prediction efficiency. The multi-faceted comparison of performance, feature importance, and operational dashboards provides the user with valuable insights, thereby confirming the effectiveness of the first unsupervised model and the second supervised multi-modal model, while fully retaining the explainability, governance, and scalability of data lineage in a comparative pair.

PeerJ Computer ScienceVol. 12
Beijing Institute of Technology (CN), Beijing Institute of Big Data Research (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.