Sex-Specific Responses to Intermittent Fasting: A Narrative Review Across Physiological, Clinical, and Psychosocial Contexts

Background/Objectives: Intermittent fasting (IF) has gained increasing attention as a nutritional strategy to improve metabolic health, body composition, and disease-related outcomes. However, its effects are often interpreted as broadly uniform, despite growing evidence that biological sex may modulate fasting responses. This narrative review examines sex-specific differences in the physiological, endocrine, clinical, and psychosocial effects of IF in women and men. Methods: We conducted a narrative synthesis of human and preclinical evidence addressing IF protocols, mechanisms, benefits, adverse effects, and sex-related differences. Particular attention was given to substrate metabolism, hormonal regulation, neuroendocrine sensitivity, energy availability, exercise performance, chronic disease management, aging-related outcomes, and psychological or behavioral responses. Results: The available literature suggests that women and men share several beneficial responses to IF, including improvements in body composition and cardiometabolic markers, but may differ in the magnitude, tolerability, and mechanistic basis of these effects. Women appear to show greater sensitivity of reproductive and neuroendocrine function to energetic stress, particularly under conditions of low energy availability, high exercise load, or reproductive vulnerability. In contrast, men may exhibit preserved functional outcomes despite measurable endocrine adaptations, including changes in testosterone dynamics. Across both sexes, responses vary according to fasting protocol, nutritional adequacy, baseline metabolic status, life stage, and clinical context. Conclusions: Current evidence supports a sex-informed and context-specific interpretation of IF rather than universally applicable fasting prescriptions. Direct sex-comparative studies remain scarce, and many conclusions are inferred from parallel male and female studies. Future research should integrate sex as a core biological variable in precision nutrition and fasting-based interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nutrients
Published
2026-05-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nu18101502
Primary Topic
Dietary Effects on Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sex-Specific Responses to Intermittent Fasting: A Narrative Review Across Physiological, Clinical, and Psychosocial Contexts

Patricia De Castro-Martinez, Diego Liviu Boaru, C. García-Montero, Óscar Fraile-Martínez et al.
Nutrients
Dietary Effects on Health
article

Sex-Specific Responses to Intermittent Fasting: A Narrative Review Across Physiological, Clinical, and Psychosocial Contexts

Patricia De Castro-Martinez, Diego Liviu Boaru, C. García-Montero, Óscar Fraile-Martínez, M A Ortega Ortega
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Intermittent fasting (IF) has gained increasing attention as a nutritional strategy to improve metabolic health, body composition, and disease-related outcomes. However, its effects are often interpreted as broadly uniform, despite growing evidence that biological sex may modulate fasting responses. This narrative review examines sex-specific differences in the physiological, endocrine, clinical, and psychosocial effects of IF in women and men. Methods: We conducted a narrative synthesis of human and preclinical evidence addressing IF protocols, mechanisms, benefits, adverse effects, and sex-related differences. Particular attention was given to substrate metabolism, hormonal regulation, neuroendocrine sensitivity, energy availability, exercise performance, chronic disease management, aging-related outcomes, and psychological or behavioral responses. Results: The available literature suggests that women and men share several beneficial responses to IF, including improvements in body composition and cardiometabolic markers, but may differ in the magnitude, tolerability, and mechanistic basis of these effects. Women appear to show greater sensitivity of reproductive and neuroendocrine function to energetic stress, particularly under conditions of low energy availability, high exercise load, or reproductive vulnerability. In contrast, men may exhibit preserved functional outcomes despite measurable endocrine adaptations, including changes in testosterone dynamics. Across both sexes, responses vary according to fasting protocol, nutritional adequacy, baseline metabolic status, life stage, and clinical context. Conclusions: Current evidence supports a sex-informed and context-specific interpretation of IF rather than universally applicable fasting prescriptions. Direct sex-comparative studies remain scarce, and many conclusions are inferred from parallel male and female studies. Future research should integrate sex as a core biological variable in precision nutrition and fasting-based interventions.

NutrientsVol. 18(10)
Universidad de Alcalá (ES), Instituto Cajal (ES), Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (ES)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Dietary Effects on Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.