Saving Enlightenment: Jefferson’s Bible, Douglass’s Faith, and the Work of the Spirit

This article argues that Frederick Douglass’s invocations of Christian spirituality, specifically his belief in divine power and prophecy, constitute a mode of political judgment that (1) grounds his moral convictions, (2) animates his immanent critique of proslavery theology and racial science from their own stated premises, and (3) widens the scope of public reason beyond secular rationalism, scientific empiricism, and inherited religious custom. Against Thomas Jefferson’s “materialist” foreclosure of spiritual discourse, which modern scholarship risks reproducing, Douglass envisions a liberal democratic order in which prophetic spirituality can refine and expand democratic commitments. Methodologically, this article models an approach to intellectual history that treats spirituality as a mode of political reasoning in its own right, rather than as background context or rhetorical convention. Recovering this dimension of Douglass’s thought complicates narratives of secularization and reconceives Enlightenment liberalism as a framework in which faith, reason, and democracy are fundamentally imbricated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Modern Intellectual History
Published
2026-05-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s1479244326100572
Primary Topic
American Constitutional Law and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Saving Enlightenment: Jefferson’s Bible, Douglass’s Faith, and the Work of the Spirit

Keidrick Roy
Modern Intellectual History
American Constitutional Law and Politics
article

Saving Enlightenment: Jefferson’s Bible, Douglass’s Faith, and the Work of the Spirit

Keidrick Roy
article en

Abstract

This article argues that Frederick Douglass’s invocations of Christian spirituality, specifically his belief in divine power and prophecy, constitute a mode of political judgment that (1) grounds his moral convictions, (2) animates his immanent critique of proslavery theology and racial science from their own stated premises, and (3) widens the scope of public reason beyond secular rationalism, scientific empiricism, and inherited religious custom. Against Thomas Jefferson’s “materialist” foreclosure of spiritual discourse, which modern scholarship risks reproducing, Douglass envisions a liberal democratic order in which prophetic spirituality can refine and expand democratic commitments. Methodologically, this article models an approach to intellectual history that treats spirituality as a mode of political reasoning in its own right, rather than as background context or rhetorical convention. Recovering this dimension of Douglass’s thought complicates narratives of secularization and reconceives Enlightenment liberalism as a framework in which faith, reason, and democracy are fundamentally imbricated.

Modern Intellectual History
Dartmouth College (US), Dartmouth Hospital (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
American Constitutional Law and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Saving Enlightenment: Jefferson’s Bible, Douglass’s Faith, and the Work of the Spirit — Keidrick Roy · Modern Intellectual History (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS